Search for: "Price v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 13,165
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am by Daniel J. Gilman
The decision is, in many respects, grounded in established law, applying the Baker Hughes burden-shifting framework, and considering price effects (and consumer welfare); likelihood of entry; and, indeed, likely merger efficiencies. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am by Ashley Morgan
Crude oil contains metals such as Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Nickel (Ni), and Vanadium (V). [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The drug price-fixing conspiracy – which became the focus of investigations by the Department of Justice, 49 state attorney generals, and Congress– has embroiled the generic pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
The price is too high.Now, in this particular case, I agree that the failure to provide post-seizure notice in the particular manner required by state law doesn't require suppression or invalidation of the conviction. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am by Keith Szeliga
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am by Samuel Bray
Palmer, especially since most state courts at the time went the other way (that note quotes from an article in the American Journal of Legal History by William Meyer, who has a very interesting forthcoming book on Riggs v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 12:09 am by Xandra Kramer
The legal bases of the claim are therefore abuse of economic dominance in the market (Article 102 TFEU) and prohibited vertical price fixing (Article 101 TFEU). [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 12:16 pm
See https://casetext.com/case/united-states-v-deutsche-telekom-ag. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 4:00 am by Michael C. Dorf
The Myrontana legislature legalized same-sex marriage in 2010, five years before the Supreme Court ruling in Obergefell v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 1:19 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Short Reports Have a substantial immediate impact on stock price. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 12:47 pm by Daniel J. Gilman
The downstream product market is relatively competitive, so some of those efficiency gains will be passed on to consumers in the form of lower prices. [read post]