Search for: "Price v. United States"
Results 141 - 160
of 5,298
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 May 2015, 3:29 am
The CAFC case Takeda v. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 2:01 pm
Earlier this month, the United States Supreme Court heard argument in the case of Beach Renourishment v. [read post]
14 Dec 2020, 6:58 am
On December 10th, the Supreme Court of the United States issued its ruling in Rutledge v. [read post]
24 Mar 2014, 3:44 pm
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia (No. 1:11-cv-02075). [read post]
19 Sep 2012, 9:23 am
These questions underlay a case heard in the United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit. [read post]
11 Mar 2022, 1:38 pm
See United States v. [read post]
12 Sep 2008, 5:23 pm
The Ninth Circuit had to determine whether Centerprise's claim, that higher prices in the United States caused its foreign injury because defendants could not have raised prices worldwide without fixing prices in the United States, satisfied the domestic injury exception. [read post]
10 Aug 2009, 9:16 am
United States v. [read post]
15 Jun 2023, 8:07 am
United States, No. 22-CV-1466 (Fed. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 5:46 am
In Hertz Corp. v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
Legal Writing Pro Ross Guberman offers an analysis of Wal-Mart’s brief in the recent United States Supreme Court case Wal-Mart v. [read post]
14 May 2010, 4:30 am
After remand from the Federal Circuit, the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas ruled that, due to the penal nature of the false marking statute, the appropriate penalty for marking a product with an incorrect or invalid patent number should be assessed at the maximum price the articles were sold, rather than the profit margin or economic benefit to the defendant. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:35 pm
The general assertion that the defendants "conspired to coordinate potash prices and price increases so as to fix, raise, maintain, and stabilize the price at which potash was sold in the United States at artificially inflated and anticompetitive levels" was wholly conclusory and insufficient to satisfy the pleading standards established by the U.S. [read post]
4 Jun 2015, 4:08 pm
On May 18, 2015, The Supreme Court of the United States (“Supreme Court”) reversed the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals’ (“9th Circuit”) ruling in Tibble et al. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2023, 11:23 am
For services that are “of a type” offered and sold competitively in substantial quantities in the commercial marketplace, the contracting officer must determine that the offeror has submitted sufficient information to evaluate price reasonableness through price analysis.[38] For DoD, NASA, and the Coast Guard, minor modifications to commercial products that do not change the commercial product to other than commercial are exempt from the requirement to submit certified… [read post]
25 May 2011, 5:47 am
Healthcare facilities can’t bring False Claims Act lawsuits to enforce ceiling-price contracts between drug manufacturers and the Secretary of Health and Human Services, according to the United States Supreme Court in Astra USA v. [read post]
18 Jun 2012, 7:38 pm
The court refused to “disregard a decision of the United States Supreme Court and the numerous cases that have relied on it. [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 6:56 pm
United States, 406 U.S. 128, 155 (1972). [read post]
10 May 2010, 10:53 am
While the "first sale" rule certainly applies to goods purchased within the United States and subsequently resold within the United States, at issue here is whether or not the rule applies to goods bought abroad and then resold in the United States, as Costco did in this case. [read post]
30 Apr 2008, 5:47 am
United States, 76 Fed. [read post]
