Search for: "SHAW v. CALIFORNIA" Results 141 - 160 of 345
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jun 2015, 9:18 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Authored by Seyfarth Shaw LLPBy Andrew McNaught Readers will recall that we recently corralled the law on “Assistive Animals” in the workplace, here. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 4:37 am by David DePaolo
The California Insurance Guarantee Association then assumed its liabilities.CIGA and Patterson both stipulated to having Dr. [read post]
California Classification Laws: In addition to staying on the right side of the FTC, companies should also be careful to stay on the right side of the recent California Supreme Court decision in Dynamex Operations West, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 9:27 am
California Coastal Comm'n (cert petition on Williamson County and Penn Central) Aspen Creek Estates, Ltd. v. [read post]
13 Nov 2014, 3:21 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
Free food regular rate miscalculation cases have actually been around in California since the Seventies (e.g., Marshall v. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 1:58 pm by David Lat
Continue reading »Follow Above the Law on Twitter or become a fan on Facebook.Tags: 2nd Circuit, Bankruptcy, Biglaw, California, Chapter 7, Chapter 7 Bankruptcy, Clawback agreements, Clawback provisions, Clawbacks, Colleen McMahon, Coudert Brothers, Dissolution, Jewel v. [read post]
22 Feb 2014, 6:00 am by Mary Whisner
MoranRepresentation and Raceblindness: The Story of Shaw v. [read post]
17 Apr 2015, 5:30 am by Kenneth J. Vanko
My colleague Robert Milligan at Seyfarth Shaw predictably beat me to the punch in commenting on the Ninth Circuit's recent opinion in Golden v. [read post]
23 Nov 2015, 12:51 pm by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
The CCA also considers contrasting California authority: the California Supreme Court, in Pineda v. [read post]
10 Feb 2008, 3:02 am
LEXIS 9187 (ND CA, Jan. 9, 2008), a California federal district court permitted an inmate to proceed with his First Amendment, RLUIPA and equal protection claims that correctional officers denied him a breakfast tray meeting his religious dietary requirements, and when he objected, they sprayed him with pepper spray.In Shaw v. [read post]
9 Mar 2007, 4:27 pm
For wage and hour attorneys, Wednesday's hearing in Murphy v. [read post]