Search for: "Sales v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 21,156
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Jul 2024, 9:05 pm by Samantha Heavner
” The case, Johnson v. [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 3:20 pm by CFM Admin
In addition to the violations surrounding hypothetical performance, one adviser was also found to have (i) made false and misleading statements, (ii) advertised misleading model performance, (iii) been unable to substantiate performance shown in its advertisements, (iv) failed to enter into written agreements with people it compensated for endorsements, and (v) violated recordkeeping and compliance standards including filing a prospectus with the SEC which contained misleading statements… [read post]
11 Jul 2024, 9:24 am by centerforartlaw
Some historians report a very limited participation in slave trading due to a prohibition of the sale of its citizens from the 16th century and an embargo on the sale of enslaved men which lasted for approximately 100 to 200 years, effectively leaving the Kingdom isolated from major political and economic changes along the coast.[22] Others state that at its height, the kingdom supplied up to 3,000 slaves a year.[23] Historian James D. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
And time and again, those courts determined that the transactions at issue—ranging from investment opportunities in oil barrels to fishing boats to silver foxes—did in fact constitute the offer or sale of securities.[8] And then in 1946, the Supreme Court issued its seminal opinion in SEC v. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 1:44 pm by Charles Bolton
Notably, each applicant must prove that the proposed project would generate new income, lodging, real property or sales taxes exceeding the amount of the awarded credit upon completion. [read post]
10 Jul 2024, 6:55 am by Dennis Crouch
  The case is important as APEX and other similar private sales-channel enforcement processes become increasingly popular. [read post]
9 Jul 2024, 4:00 am by Sherica Celine
In Transform Holdco , the United States Supreme Court resolved a split among the Circuit Courts as to whether Section 363(m) is a jurisdictional provision (i.e., depriving an appellate court of jurisdiction to hear a challenge to a sale order). [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:13 pm by John Floyd
Connecticut (state ban on contraceptives for married couples declared unconstitutional), and Lawrence v. [read post]