Search for: "Seth Barrett Tillman, Josh Blackman"
Results 141 - 160
of 208
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Sep 2017, 12:52 pm
For full length treatments of these queries, see Tillman’s many publications on this subject. 1. [read post]
25 Apr 2024, 9:00 am
Seth Barrett Tillman wrote about it here. [read post]
15 May 2023, 5:30 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
31 May 2023, 12:23 pm
[This post was co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman] Last month, a Manhattan grand jury indicted Donald J. [read post]
31 Dec 2021, 5:00 am
, 2021 University of Illinois Law Review Online 190 (2021) (with Seth Barrett Tillman). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 11:13 am
Earlier this year, Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote an essay for the Illinois Law Review on President Biden's first 100 days. [read post]
11 Jan 2022, 8:02 am
Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote an article about two phrases in Section 3: "officer of the United States" and "office . . . under the United States. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 4:23 pm
This is the argument that Seth Barrett Tillman and I have advanced. [read post]
9 Dec 2021, 10:25 pm
(Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote about that choice here). [read post]
10 May 2023, 5:00 am
”] [This post is co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman.] [read post]
5 Jul 2024, 2:33 pm
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I acknowledged that "abuse of power" could form the basis of an article of impeachment, but we explained that this term was exceptionally difficult to define with regard to politicians. [read post]
29 Jun 2024, 8:34 pm
Barrett does not explain. [read post]
21 May 2020, 2:17 pm
Maryland could help decide the Faithless Electors Cases] [This post was co-authored with Professor Seth Barrett Tillman] Last week, we posed three questions concerning the characterization of presidential electors. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 5:30 am
"] Seth Barrett Tillman and I published a new essay in the American Spectator concerning Special Counsel Jack Smith's pending appeal to the Eleventh Circuit. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 1:29 pm
"] In May, Seth Barrett Tillman and I discussed on Lawfare whether the President was an "Officer of the United States" for purposes of the federal officer removal statute. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 5:04 pm
Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote a lengthy post on this case in July 2019. [read post]
8 Aug 2024, 6:41 am
(Seth Barrett Tillman and I explain why the holding of Nixon, whatever it is, was limited to some "unique" facts—which is precisely what the decision repeatedly stated.) [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 8:22 pm
" Seth Barrett Tillman and I wrote in early 2020 that even if Trump were convicted of violating this statute, he could not be disqualified from serving a second term as President. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 1:01 pm
See Josh Blackman & Seth Barrett Tillman, Offices and Officers of the Constitution, Part II: The Four Approaches, 61 South Texas Law Review 321, 421 (2022) (concluding that the Speaker and Senate President Pro Tempore are "Officers" for purposes of the Succession Clause, and can succeed to the presidency.) [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 1:37 pm
I responded to this argument in three posts (1, 2, and 3), the first co-authored with Seth Barrett Tillman. [read post]
