Search for: "Smith v. Superior Court"
Results 141 - 160
of 832
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Mar 2023, 5:01 am
In the case of Yoder v. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 2:17 am
Rakusen v Jepsen and others [2023] UKSC 9, where the Court will determine whether a Rent Repayment Order can only be made against an immediate landlord or can a superior landlord also be liable. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 1:27 pm
Smith v. [read post]
14 Feb 2023, 12:33 pm
In that case, the superior court’s jurisdiction is derivative, and no indictment is necessary. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 1:59 pm
Smith, 943 S.W.2d 414, 420 (Tex. 1997). [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 6:42 pm
Now it’s time to introduce Smith v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 3:41 am
The court will consider the question: can a Rent Repayment Order only be made against an immediate landlord or can a superior landlord also be liable? [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 8:30 am
Although the state moved to amend the location in the statement of charges, and the superior court granted that motion, the Court of Appeals explained that this did not remedy the defect. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 6:59 pm
The court also upheld CADA under Employment Division v. [read post]
29 Nov 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Waters v. [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 7:42 am
The court explained the “trial court first applied the factors outlined in [Daubert v. [read post]
8 Nov 2022, 8:26 am
State v. [read post]
2 Nov 2022, 5:28 am
Smith & Nephew (Supreme Court 2022) The Supreme Court issued a major opinion in this case back in 2021, holding that the IPR scheme was unconstitutional because it placed administrative patent judges in the role of entering final decisions that were unreviewable by any superior executive officer. [read post]
30 Oct 2022, 10:01 am
The case raises an interesting question of “respondeat superior” for the negligent acts by employees in the course of employment. [read post]
24 Oct 2022, 5:14 am
Canada The Superior Court of Justice, Ontario handed down judgement in Marcellin v LPS et all 2022 ONSC 5886. [read post]
23 Oct 2022, 6:30 am
Smith(2017), suggesting that he may not be eager to revisit marriage equality. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:24 am
In the case of McGuinness v. [read post]
11 Oct 2022, 5:00 am
In the case of Kendall v. [read post]
30 Sep 2022, 5:28 pm
Superior Court, Santa Clara, 74 Cal.App.4th 1008, 1012 (Cal. [read post]
22 Sep 2022, 8:12 am
State v. [read post]
