Search for: "South Carolina v. Harry" Results 141 - 160 of 190
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Dec 2011, 1:28 pm by Mack Sperling
  The North Carolina Business Court dismissed identical claims (brought by the same Plaintiff's counsel) early in 2011 in Harris v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 11:21 pm
There seems to be no question that the Bishop of South Carolina knew that there was legal coun[sel] from the PB's office. [read post]
19 Mar 2011, 11:05 am
But the Episcopal Church (USA) does -- all because of a repeated misreading of gratuitous dictum laid down by that careful scholar of the Constitution, Justice Harry Blackmun (the outcome-based author of Roe v. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 9:37 pm by cdw
Torres contends the photographs should have been excluded based on South Carolina Rule of Evidence 403, and the videotape recording should have been excluded based on either Rule 403 or Section 16-3-25(C)(1) of the South Carolina Code (2003). [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 9:16 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Bloomsbury Press, 2010.Civil RightsKF4155 .S77 2010Mendez v. [read post]
27 Oct 2010, 9:24 pm
ENS reports that she had the Council authorize a response to the Episcopal Forum of South Carolina, which explained that "there are canonical limits to how her office and the Executive Council can intervene" in the situation there. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 3:00 am by John Day
FN6 The 21 states using the ‘50 percent’ modified form: Connecticut, Delaware, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, South Carolina, Texas, Vermont, Wisconsin, and Wyoming. [read post]
28 May 2010, 7:16 am by Erin Miller
” The AP (via the Boston Globe) is reporting that two Republican Senators –  Lindsey Graham of South Carolina and George LeMieux of Florida – indicated yesterday that Kagan’s lack of judicial experience was not likely to be a concern; neither senator, however, committed to voting in favor of her confirmation. [read post]
10 May 2010, 1:16 pm by admin
– Enviro.BLR.com, May 5, 2010 A major railway company has agreed to pay $4 million penalty to resolve alleged CWA and CERCLA violations for a 2005 chlorine spill in Graniteville, South Carolina. [read post]