Search for: "State v. Breaker" Results 141 - 160 of 235
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
The only difference discoverable between the two cases is, that each representative of the United States will be elected by five or six thousand citizens; whilst in the individual States, the election of a representative is left to about as many hundreds. [read post]
10 May 2011, 8:52 am by Charon QC
They will have an interest in ensuring that the rule of law is upheld – but it is not for them to prosecute injunction breakers? [read post]
12 Apr 2010, 9:50 am
During his own military service, Stevens was a code-breaker during World War II. [read post]
24 May 2012, 1:46 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Disenfranchisement may also skew political processes by distorting group representation (as it arguably did in a few election campaigns in the United States, most notably the 2000 Bush v. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 2:10 pm by Lovechilde
  This means making sure those conservative Democrats running for re-election in red states understand that they will need the support of their base, and particularly Democratic women who support Roe v. [read post]
7 Apr 2013, 1:22 pm by Aparajita Lath
This view was seconded to some extent by 1977 IPRS v/s EIMPAA SC judgment. [read post]
8 Mar 2016, 4:02 pm by Anonymous
The suggested fine is $100 because it was believed by the State Attorney's Office that individuals will be less likely to fight the charges. [read post]
30 Nov 2012, 2:21 am by Jon Gelman
A repeat violation exists when an employer previously has been cited for the same or a similar violation of a standard, regulation, rule or order at any facility in federal enforcement states within the last five years. [read post]
26 Apr 2016, 4:41 am by SHG
In so doing, we overrule the contrary holdings of State v. [read post]