Search for: "State v. Holderness"
Results 141 - 160
of 8,111
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Aug 2021, 1:19 pm
In PennEast Pipeline Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2012, 1:47 pm
On October 18, 2012, in Windsor v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 9:58 am
by Dennis Crouch Allen v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am
The United States Supreme Court came out with a new patent law decision in Impression Products, Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 11:13 am
Holder that continues the slow dismantling of the United States No Fly List. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm
The Senators' letters were prompted by the March 2020 Allen v. [read post]
24 Jun 2009, 3:59 pm
Here are just a few of the many highlights: The federal sentencing system, which includes both sentencing guidelines and mandatory minimum sentencing statutes, has undergone significant change since the Supreme Court's decision in United States v. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 10:25 am
The statement is in accordance with Holder's initial statement [text] that the Department of Justice (DOJ) will be extending all federal benefits to same-sex couples legally married according to state law following the decision in United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2013, 5:54 pm
He began by reminding the Court of its 2009 decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utilities District No. 1 v. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 2:05 pm
Eldridge… Building on Hamdi v. [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 11:31 am
Eric Holder, Jr, Attorney General, known to those who follow it as the "NAMUDNO" case. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 1:31 pm
As we reported shortly after the Court released its opinion in Shelby County v. [read post]
13 Aug 2013, 12:44 pm
With United States v. [read post]
1 Sep 2021, 1:15 pm
On August 31, at the request of Senators Thom Tillis (R-NC) and Patrick Leahy (D-VT), the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USTPO) provided a report to Congress analyzing infringement disputes between patent and trademark rights holders and states and state entities. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 5:51 pm
In today’s argument in Golan v. [read post]
21 Jun 2010, 8:45 am
(Eugene Volokh) The Court just handed down its decision in Holder v. [read post]
17 Jun 2013, 9:48 am
The last indorsement stated: PAY TO THE ORDER OF: WITHOUT RECOURSE IMPAC FUNDING CORPORATION.Therefore, the Court concluded that the Note was indorsed in blank. [read post]
31 Aug 2015, 8:29 am
Very quick, unpublished opinion today in United States v. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 11:34 am
The title of this post comes from this paper by Professor Gabriel Chin, the abstract of which states: In Shelby County v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 5:53 pm
The title of this post comes from this essay by Professor Michael Solimine, the abstract of which states: In 2013 the Supreme Court in Shelby County v. [read post]
