Search for: "State v. Price"
Results 141 - 160
of 13,175
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
”[23] This violated Supreme Court precedent because “utilizing a back-end price drop as a proxy for [a] front end misrepresentation’s price impact works only if, at the front end, the misrepresentation is propping up the price. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 11:31 am
The firm improperly offered new bonds from its inventory to customers at higher prices than the initial offering prices negotiated with bond issuers. [read post]
31 Jan 2024, 9:44 am
[18] FAR 31.201-6(e)(2); see also Raytheon Co. v. [read post]
29 Jan 2024, 4:35 pm
It would be utterly self-funded too with the price horn commands within the existing markets, with many many thousands of dollars changing hand within this vile trade. [read post]
28 Jan 2024, 9:05 pm
Again, sophisticated lenders would take the adopted rules into account when they priced their loans. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 1:00 pm
This book traces the development of the jurisdiction from the foundational decisions of Huckle v Money and Wilkes v Wood in England, to leading modern cases such as Harris v Digital Pulse Pty Ltd in Australia, Whiten v Pilot Insurance Co in Canada, Couch v AG (No 2) in New Zealand, PH Hydraulics and Engineering Pte Ltd v Airtrust (Hong Kong) Ltd in Singapore and Mathias v Accor Economy Lodging, Inc and State Farm Mutual… [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 10:49 am
See Fox v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 9:01 am
” South Africa had argued that the imposition of such a requirement would follow the model the Court had used in the provisional measures phase of Ukraine v. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 7:57 am
United States. [read post]
26 Jan 2024, 6:33 am
The criminal gang responsible for this theft sold the Buddha heads to a dealer from Chengdu at $1500, and they then sold them to a buyer from Southeast China for $18,500.[16] It often happens that the stolen work doubles or triples in price each time it is transferred to a new buyer. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 6:32 am
The decision is, in many respects, grounded in established law, applying the Baker Hughes burden-shifting framework, and considering price effects (and consumer welfare); likelihood of entry; and, indeed, likely merger efficiencies. [read post]
25 Jan 2024, 5:31 am
Crude oil contains metals such as Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), Manganese (Mn), Nickel (Ni), and Vanadium (V). [read post]
24 Jan 2024, 7:14 am
Price v. [read post]
23 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
The drug price-fixing conspiracy – which became the focus of investigations by the Department of Justice, 49 state attorney generals, and Congress– has embroiled the generic pharmaceutical industry. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 9:01 pm
You are probably well acquainted with its successor, rule 506.[2] Prior to the adoption of former rule 146 in April 1974, the Commission did not have rules interpreting section 4(2) of the Securities Act.[3] As a result, issuers faced uncertainty in determining whether a sale of securities did not involve “any public offering” and in applying case law on the topic, including the Supreme Court’s decision in SEC v. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 4:31 pm
The price is too high.Now, in this particular case, I agree that the failure to provide post-seizure notice in the particular manner required by state law doesn't require suppression or invalidation of the conviction. [read post]
22 Jan 2024, 7:59 am
” * United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2024, 10:59 am
Welcome back to the Cost Corner, where we provide practical insight into the complex cost and pricing requirements that apply to Government contractors. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:52 am
Palmer, especially since most state courts at the time went the other way (that note quotes from an article in the American Journal of Legal History by William Meyer, who has a very interesting forthcoming book on Riggs v. [read post]
18 Jan 2024, 8:01 am
Clark v. [read post]
