Search for: "State v. Angle" Results 141 - 160 of 941
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
It’s quite common for plaintiffs to sue under similar state and federal provisions. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 2:28 pm by Ashley Ludlow
OBJECTIVE V:  Enabling the development of broadband-enabled health technologies that are designed to be fully accessible to people with disabilities. [read post]
2 Jul 2017, 12:52 am
 (Eli Lilly v Novopharm (2010 FCA 197)This exercise requires:Reviewing the entire specification (claims and entire disclosure)Identifying the promises made in the entire specification Determining whether the patent fulfils those promises by demonstration or sound prediction.This exercise is a question of law viewed through the skilled person at the time of filing (with the assistance of expert evidence) and has been applied in several cases (BMS v Apotex (2005 FC 1348),… [read post]
1 Jul 2017, 9:39 am
 (Eli Lilly v Novopharm (2010 FCA 197)This exercise requires:Reviewing the entire specification (claims and entire disclosure)Identifying the promises made in the entire specification Determining whether the patent fulfils those promises by demonstration or sound prediction.This exercise is a question of law viewed through the skilled person at the time of filing (with the assistance of expert evidence) and has been applied in several cases (BMS v Apotex (2005 FC 1348),… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 10:29 pm by Phillip V. Marano
  Rather, originality requisite for copyright protection is found in a photographer's selection of any number of artistic choices including angle, lighting, and arrangement of the subject.Ultimately, the Supreme Court affirmed the Second Circuit's holding that Sarony's photo was an "original work of art" and "the product of [Sarony's] intellectual invention. [read post]
17 Jan 2023, 12:56 am by Rose Hughes
UK judges have already observed that an equivalent of the Formstein defence may be permissible in the UK (Technetix v Teleste and Facebook v Voxer). [read post]
26 Jun 2024, 2:01 pm by Eric Goldman
Vullo decision, where it held that the NRA had stated a claim for impermissible censorship due to government jawboning. [read post]
27 Aug 2012, 7:50 am by Lisa R. Pruitt
  See, for example, the State of Victoria's website here. [read post]
5 May 2013, 3:41 pm by familoo
Baker J on the rare cases that must go outside of 26 weeks here in Devon CC v EB & Ors [2013] EWHC 968 (Fam). [read post]
One might query if this was the intended effect of the decision because from this angle, such Signatory States appear to be worse off than non-Signatory States over which the UPC is yet to rule it has competence. [read post]