Search for: "State v. Flow" Results 141 - 160 of 5,641
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in Grutter v. [read post]
16 Feb 2012, 2:19 pm
The United States Supreme Court, in a 5-4 decision written by Justice Sandra Day O’Connor in Grutter v. [read post]
8 Oct 2015, 11:25 am by Lisa Baird
In a decision with significant potential ramifications for flows of personal data from the European Union to the United States, the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) handed down its judgment in Maximillian Schrems v Data Protection Commissioner (Case C-362/14) that the Safe Harbor Decision no longer provides adequate protection for data transferred between the EU and the U.S. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm by Melody Lanier
Renowned for its tourism and agricultural exports, Florida sees a considerable flow of trucks carrying goods ranging from oranges to consumer products.4. [read post]
12 Oct 2023, 12:48 pm by Melody Lanier
Renowned for its tourism and agricultural exports, Florida sees a considerable flow of trucks carrying goods ranging from oranges to consumer products.4. [read post]
21 May 2012, 1:28 pm by WIMS
Specifically, the appeal flows from this court's decision in Yankee Atomic Electric Co. v. [read post]
26 Dec 2023, 4:34 am by Mark Tabakman
  The case is entitled Asaro-Angelo v STG Logistics Inc. and was filed in Superior Court in Essex County, The State has sued to stop the company from allegedly misclassifying more than three hundred (300) drivers as independent contractors. [read post]
25 Feb 2015, 3:13 am by Amy Howe
  Jeremy Jacobs reports for Greenwire that “[a] majority of the justices held that Nebraska knowingly violated an interstate compact governing the river, depriving Kansas of water that should have flowed over the states’ border. [read post]
26 Sep 2013, 7:48 am by Todd Janzen
On September 20, 2013, the district court issued its ruling in Gulf Restoration Network v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 5:02 am
" The district court then acknowledge that this practice "is not explicitly stated in our model protective order (or in the similar protective order adopted in this case), but this practice necessarily flows from the restrictions that are explicit, namely a limited list of allowed recipients that plainly omits the public. [read post]