Search for: "State v. Lujan"
Results 141 - 160
of 205
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Apr 2007, 4:20 pm
Rumsfeld v. [read post]
28 May 2021, 3:33 pm
The United States Supreme Court explained the three legal elements of standing in the case of Lujan v. [read post]
29 Nov 2023, 5:00 am
Lujan v. [read post]
29 May 2012, 2:56 pm
See Lujan v. [read post]
17 May 2016, 9:39 am
Corp. v. [read post]
7 Dec 2018, 9:49 am
Background on Standing in Data Breach Litigation In order to establish Article III standing, a party must adequately allege three elements: an injury in fact, described by the Court in Lujan v. [read post]
2 Aug 2021, 7:16 am
City of Hallandale Beach, Fla., 996 F.3d 1110, 1112–13 (11th Cir. 2021) (citing Lujan v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 1:30 pm
Lujan 14-132Issue: Whether this Court has “clearly established,” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 4:00 pm
The judge cited Lujan v. [read post]
6 Jul 2007, 10:11 am
Ct. at 1452 (quoting Flast v. [read post]
1 Dec 2009, 4:20 pm
Supreme Court case called Lujan v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 10:45 am
Lujan, No. [read post]
9 Jul 2009, 8:01 pm
In re Polar Bear Endangered Species Act Listing and Section 4(d) Litigation and Safari Club International, et al. v. [read post]
30 Mar 2015, 8:31 am
See, e.g., Lujan v. [read post]
2 May 2010, 1:12 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Mar 2024, 7:17 am
[Live commentary on the Supreme Court oral argument in FDA v. [read post]
25 Apr 2023, 1:11 pm
See also ROONEY V. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:30 pm
Lujan 14-132Issue: Whether this Court has “clearly established,” within the meaning of 28 U.S.C. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 8:46 pm
[In a brief per curiam opinion, the Fifth Circuit concludes the plaintiff states lack standing to press their claims. ] Last month, in Louisiana v. [read post]
12 Jun 2020, 2:35 pm
The court explained that unlike free-standing “procedural rights”—like the one it struck down in Lujan v. [read post]
