Search for: "State v. March" Results 141 - 160 of 22,423
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jan 2007, 1:09 am
On March 16, 2006, I did this post on United States v. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 2:21 am
Ruttle Plant Hire Ltd v Secretary of State for Environment Food and Rural Affairs (No 3) Court of Appeal “Mistakes in a supplier's invoice did not enable the paying party to avoid late payment interest penalties. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 2:10 pm by Amy Howe
Luxshare (March 23) (consolidated with AlixPartners LLP v. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 2:00 am by Matrix Legal Support Service
On Tuesday 16 March, the Supreme Court will hear the case of BF (Eritrea) v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 1:46 am by Family Law
From Margaret Ryznar, writing for the Huffington Post: In early March, the United States Supreme Court handed down the opinion in its most recent international abduction case, Lozano v. [read post]
18 Mar 2004, 4:01 pm
US Supreme Court Chief Justice Earl Warren was born on March 19, 1891, in Los Angeles, California. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 2:25 am
Regina (Shrewsbury and Atcham Borough Council and Another) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government Court of Appeal “Proposals to replace two-tier local government in some parts of the country with unitary authorities, made before the necessary statutory powers were in place, were lawful as long as genuine reconsideration had been given to them after the commencement of the relevant Act. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 2:51 am by sally
Regina (Save Britain’s Heritage) v Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government and another [2011] EWCA Civ 334; [2011] WLR (D) 107 “Demolition works were capable of constituting a project for the purposes of article 1(2) of Council Directive 85/337/EEC on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 2:27 am by sally
Bridge Trustees Ltd v Yates and others (Secretary of State for Work and Pensions intervening) [2010] EWCA Civ 179; [2010] WLR (D) 65 “Where a hybrid occupational pension scheme was being wound up the benefits derived from voluntary contributions made to the scheme by the employee and matched by their employer’s contribution, ranked first in order of priority in the winding up of the scheme. [read post]