Search for: "Stokes v. State" Results 141 - 160 of 449
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2009, 6:10 am
  On October 1, 2008, the Court vacated the decision of the April 4, 2007 WCAC decision and remanded the case to the Board of Magistrates for reconsideration in light of Stokes v. [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 12:35 am
- Chicago attorney Jonathan Rosenfeld on Strellis & Field's Chicago Nursing Home Lawyer Blog Jones Day v. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Biklen and Camara Stokes Hudson of counsel), for The New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, amicus curiae.The New York City Bar Association, New York (Amber Leary, Emily G. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
Biklen and Camara Stokes Hudson of counsel), for The New York Civil Liberties Union Foundation, amicus curiae.The New York City Bar Association, New York (Amber Leary, Emily G. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 6:01 am
By Eric Goldman TrafficSchool.com, Inc. v. eDriver, Inc., 2008 WL 4000805 (C.D. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 1:57 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
Fourth Amendment fans and foes alike are awaiting oral arguments this fall in United States v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 8:31 pm
  (I'm pretty sure it's not the Billy Cox who played bass for Jimi Hendrix, although according to Wikipedia, the Stokes brothers were cousins of the late Rick James.)Since Terry was acquainted with Stokes, he called Stokes from jail. [read post]
19 Feb 2024, 8:57 am by John Mikhail
Justice Scalia was exactly right about this—and for that matter, so was Chief Justice Marshall, who clarified this very point in his circuit opinion in United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2023, 6:30 am by ernst
Nor does the “engage” prong extend to inaction—for example, failing to take action with regard to an insurrection or rebellion.Part V considers another threshold question: was Trump ever subject to Section 3? [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 4:48 am by Chris Laughton
Like me (but he expresses it far more eloquently in Virtualpurple), Norris J prefers the decision of HHJ McCahill QC in Hill v Stokes Plc [2010] EWHC 3726. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 5:47 am by Joy Waltemath
The state agency did not suffer prejudice from the court’s instruction concerning the location or manner of the employee’s leave, and the agency was not entitled to a jury instruction absolving it from liability for an “honest belief” in its decision (DaPrato v. [read post]
29 Oct 2020, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat and Daniel B. Edelman
They did so where the recount included some votes in the state and excluded others, a circumstance hardly likely to recur.Moreover, had there been an objection to the Florida electors presented to Congress, Bush v. [read post]