Search for: "The PEOPLE v. Sims"
Results 141 - 160
of 209
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Dec 2010, 7:46 pm
There are a number of people in a number of developing states worth watching carefully. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 12:49 am
Sims & Co., Inc. v. [read post]
29 Sep 2010, 2:39 pm
The People thereupon notified condemned inmates, including Sims, that they would resume scheduling executions. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:15 pm
However, the battery . . . was dead, so Herrera removed the SIM card and placed it in another cell phone. . . . [read post]
22 Aug 2010, 9:20 pm
(84) Pittsburgh: People were going for DSTs early, so I joined the bandwagon. 10 [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 8:15 pm
See People v. [read post]
6 Aug 2010, 10:59 am
The Court of Appeal, in an opinion by Justice Sims -- joined by Justice Raye and the future Chief Justice of the California Supreme Court, Justice Cantil-Sakauye -- says yes.I've changed the facts of the opinion, of course. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 11:08 pm
Employment Comm'n, 28 Cal.2d 33, 43-44, 168 P.2d 686 (1946), overruled on other grounds by People v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 10:40 pm
An imputation will be considered defamatory if it exposed the plaintiff to hate, contempt or ridicule (see Ettingshausen v Australian Consolidated Press (1991) 23 NSW LR 443); tended to make the plaintiff shunned or avoided (Morgan v Lingen (1863) 8 LT 800); tended to lower the plaintiff in the estimation of others (Sim v Stretch (1936) 52 TLR 669). [read post]
28 Jul 2010, 12:00 am
PEOPLE v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:29 am
Hunt v. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 12:46 pm
That case, Skilling v. [read post]
16 Jun 2010, 7:20 am
Neither Sim v Stretch nor Jameel are directed to the issue and provide no clear support for the approach. [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:06 pm
I‘ve never seen so many people so eager to get out of here. [read post]
10 May 2010, 4:51 am
Sims said after the hearing the house needs to be protected because of threats to burn it down. [read post]
8 Apr 2010, 9:36 am
[Post by Venkat] Saffold v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 1:04 pm
Torts folks might be interested in a recent paper by Griffin Sims Edwards (Emory, Econ), Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:19 am
This piece, recently posted to SSRN, suggests that the obligations to disclose under the Tarasoff case caused an increase in homicide (presumably by disincentivizing treatment of the most at-risk patients): "Doing Their Duty: An Empirical Analysis of the Unintended Effect of Tarasoff v Regents on Homicidal Activity" GRIFFIN SIMS EDWARDS, Emory University, Department of EconomicsThe effect of state duty to warn laws inspired by Tarasoff v Regents has been… [read post]
2 Mar 2010, 12:36 pm
"So I am concerned about the 5 hours, about the lack of recusal for cause, about the very, very brief questions that he provided to people who had said on the questionnaire they could be -- they could be biased. [read post]
1 Mar 2010, 11:35 am
The Justices seemed far more interested in the jury issue than in the other high-profile question before them in Skilling v. [read post]
