Search for: "Thomas v. Social Security Administration"
Results 141 - 160
of 363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Oct 2019, 7:20 pm
That year, the EEOC issued an extensive administrative ruling that reached three conclusions: first, sexual orientation discrimination is a form of gender stereotyping, which the Supreme Court held in Price Waterhouse v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 9:01 pm
In Part I, we will address the recent per curiam opinion in Frank v. [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 10:26 am
Michael Flynn—who would later serve as National Security Advisor in the Trump Administration—recalled that Trump made this request repeatedly…” [Vol. 1, p. 62] IV. [read post]
30 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
Justice Thomas only this past week, for example, indicated that the Court should not be hesitant to overrule its own precedents should they be manifestly unjust.I realize that I basically agree with the McCloskeyan approach and, therefore, am inclined to agree with much of Lessig’s argument insofar as it is similar. [read post]
31 May 2019, 6:00 am
Though the law has survived innumerable attempts at repeal and administrative sabotage, its intransigent foes, prominently including the Trump administration, are still out to kill it in the courts, and the residual skepticism seeded by the misbegotten-birth narrative could help legitimate their aspiration that, this third, legally absurd, attempt might just succeed. [read post]
29 May 2019, 7:15 am
Berryhill, the court unanimously held that a Social Security Administration Appeals Council dismissal on timeliness grounds of a request for review after a claimant has had an administrative law judge hearing on the merits qualifies as a “final decision . . . made after a hearing” for purposes of allowing judicial review under 42 U.S.C. [read post]
28 May 2019, 2:08 pm
Court of Appeals for the 6th Circuit and holds that an appeals council’s dismissal of a Social Security claim on timeliness grounds when the claimant has had an administrative law hearing qualifies as a final decision “made after a hearing” so as to allow judicial review under the Social Security Act. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
This convinced Strom Thurmond, the Republican kingmaker in the South, to put his entire weight behind the candidate, helping Nixon secure the nomination at the 1968 GOP convention. [read post]
3 May 2019, 7:21 am
In 1925, in its decision in Gitlow v. [read post]
25 Apr 2019, 12:15 pm
[iii] Thomas, Megan. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 3:59 am
Berryhill, the court held 6-3 that an administrative judge in a social security disability benefits case can rely on testimony by a vocational expert that an applicant can do “other work,” even if the expert does not provide the data she used to form her opinion. [read post]
26 Mar 2019, 3:50 am
The story is that Associate Justice Harry Blackmun was given authorship of the 7-2 majority opinion in Roe v. [read post]
10 Mar 2019, 5:08 pm
Internet and Social Media The Government has finally published its response [pdf] to the 2017 “call for evidence” on the impact of social media on the administration of justice. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:25 pm
Along the way, it relies heavily on two of the court’s precedents: the 1946 decision in Social Security Board v. [read post]
4 Mar 2019, 3:22 pm
For if [Social Security Board v.] [read post]
4 Feb 2019, 6:00 am
Allen and conversation with Thomas Wright. [read post]
1 Feb 2019, 10:51 am
Thomas E. [read post]
13 Jan 2019, 11:14 am
"I've often shared Fox News articles on social media. [read post]
30 Dec 2018, 3:03 am
Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit in Folkens v Wyland. [read post]
20 Dec 2018, 9:22 am
Activists have taken to redress the problem by advocating for nugatory “warnings” from remote suppliers, in the face of employer failures to monitor and supervise workers and the workplace, and to provide administrative, engineering, and personal protective controls. [read post]
