Search for: "Tucker v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 365
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Jun 2011, 1:18 pm by John Tucker
If you need an ERISA attorney in Florida or anywhere in the United States, call ERISA Lawyer John Tucker at (866) 282-5260 for a free consultation. [read post]
20 May 2011, 5:23 am by John Tucker
Our firm represents veterans and their families across the United States in appeals to the Board of Veterans Appeals and the U.S. [read post]
26 Feb 2019, 4:03 am by Edith Roberts
First up is United States v. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:28 pm
United States appeal, scheduled for oral argument in the US Supreme Court on November 6, 2007. [read post]
22 Oct 2007, 1:28 pm
United States appeal, scheduled for oral argument in the US Supreme Court on November 6, 2007. [read post]
13 Dec 2018, 4:54 am by Edith Roberts
United States, which involves an exception to the double jeopardy clause that allows a defendant to be prosecuted for the same crime in both federal and state court, for state-court prosecutions of potential recipients of presidential pardons; in an accompanying essay on his eponymous blog, he discusses the relation between originalism and stare decisis as invoked by Justice Brett Kavanaugh during the Gamble  In an op-ed for The New… [read post]
9 Aug 2015, 6:06 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Ruiz, 710 F.3d 1077 (9th Cir. 2013), United States v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 8:51 pm
Last week, this cert. petition (with appendix) was filed in the case of Zoltek Corp. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2011, 5:21 am by John Tucker
Bureau of Labor Statistics released a report that that union membership in the United States continues to decline. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 3:32 am by John Tucker
Although we are based in Florida, we handle cases all over the United States, and would be happy to assist you.Copyright (c) 2010 by John V. [read post]
28 Jul 2014, 5:38 am
 He then took up the first issue in the case, noting that the Court of Federal Claims is acourt of limited jurisdiction that, pursuant to the Tucker Act, may hear `any claim against the United States founded upon the Constitution, or any Act of Congress or any regulation of an executive department, or upon any express or implied contract with the United States, or for liquidated or unliquidated damages in cases not sounding in tort. [read post]