Search for: "United States v. Davis" Results 141 - 160 of 2,255
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Nov 2019, 11:30 am by John Elwood
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. [read post]
6 Nov 2019, 10:26 am by Zachary D Spilman
Davis, No. 19-0104/AR (CAAFlog case page): Oral argument audio (wma)(mp3) United States v. [read post]
29 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Howard M. Wasserman
The 11th Amendment provides that the “Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity, commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens of another State. [read post]
25 Oct 2019, 10:00 am by Eugene Volokh
United States, 485 F.2d 1087, 1097 (8th Cir. 1973) (voiding as vague statute punishing "libelous, scurrilous, defamatory words" written on the outside of an envelope"). [read post]
13 Oct 2019, 4:39 pm by INFORRM
Unites States According to court filings in the defamation lawsuit, Elon Musk overruled advice from his inner circle at Tesla and SpaceX that he offer a “genuine” apology and take a Twitter break after using the social media platform to attack a critic last year. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 7:12 am by Jay Pinho
(With the exception of a mid-September media law conference in central London featuring Justice Stephen Breyer, all other events we tracked this summer took place in the United States.) [read post]
10 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Adam Garson
Plaintiffs appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit. [read post]
9 Oct 2019, 2:05 am by INFORRM
Since Google LLC is domiciled in the United States, Mr Lloyd required permission to serve out under CPR 6.36, relying on the gateway contained in CPR PD6B – 3.1(9) i.e., claims in tort where damage was sustained, or will be sustained, within the jurisdiction. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 8:38 am
Clayton County, Georgia, Respondent (United States Supreme Court)FINRA Fines/Suspends Rep Over Mismarked "Solicitation. [read post]
3 Oct 2019, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The plaintiffs emphasize the long history of Virginia mandating disclosure of race as a means of enforcing the state’s anti-miscegenation laws prior to the Supreme Court’s 1967 decision in Loving v. [read post]