Search for: "United States v. Sutton"
Results 141 - 160
of 382
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
12 May 2021, 3:08 pm
Here are some key excerpts from Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton's opinion for a unanimous panel in Harrison v. [read post]
5 Sep 2007, 1:00 pm
Because the issue was not before them neither the majority opinion nor the dissent mentioned Sutton v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 10:12 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2021, 6:22 am
United Air Lines, Inc., and Toyota Motor Mfg., Ky., Inc. v. [read post]
25 Jun 2024, 7:36 am
Yesterday the Supreme Court granted certiorari in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am
While the criminal charges were dismissed due to the crimes being time-barred, the prosecutor still requested the Pesaro judge to issue a confiscation order for the bronze, based on Italian cultural heritage law.[14] While the Getty Trust opposed this order, in 2019 the Court of Cassation confirmed it, thus making it final under Italian law.[15] Legal Issues and the ECtHR Judgement In order to obtain the actual return of the statue, the Pesaro prosecutor had to seek the recognition and enforcement… [read post]
6 Feb 2011, 9:02 pm
” United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2023, 4:56 am
Forest Serv., 803 F.3d 809, 815–17 (6th Cir. 2015) (Sutton, J.) [read post]
23 Oct 2018, 9:16 am
E.g., United States v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 7:50 am
Supreme Court decisions, Sutton v. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 7:57 am
Lopez in 1995 and United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 6:24 am
Moreover, in Sutton v United Airlines, Inc, the Supreme Court stated that “an employer is free to decide that physical characteristics or medical conditions that do not rise to the level of an impairment — such as one’s height, build, or singing voice — are preferable to others, just as it is free to decide that some limiting, but not substantially limiting, impairments make individuals less than ideally suited for a job. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 6:26 am
See Thomas More Law Center, et al. v. [read post]
24 Jun 2022, 9:30 pm
"Chief Judge Jeffrey Sutton of the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit is joined by California Supreme Court Justice Leondra Kruger for conversation inspired by his book, Who Decides? [read post]
18 Sep 2023, 10:59 pm
” See United States v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:19 am
Commentary on Wednesday’s argument in Yates v. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 8:42 pm
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 8:43 pm
Williams held that the en banc Sixth Circuit had already held in United States v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 2:55 am
August 16, 2011): The Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution provides: “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated .... [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 11:37 am
Hawkins v. [read post]
