Search for: "United States v. Clinton" Results 141 - 160 of 1,352
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Aug 2014, 4:51 am by Timothy P. Flynn
 As is often the case with 3-judge panels, one jurist stays poker-faced; this time, it was Bush appointee, Judge Jeffery Sutton.Since the SCOTUS decision in United States v Windsor, nearly every state's federal court system has cultivated a same-sex marriage case, usually challenging the constitutionality of a state law that bans or limits the rights of same-sex couples. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 8:58 am by Bridget Crawford
The United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit has issued an order in the case Thorogood v. [read post]
10 Apr 2022, 10:30 pm
 And there was this concluding peroration:When I became a federal judge, I took an oath to “faithfully and impartially discharge and perform all duties . . . under the Constitution and laws of the United States. [read post]
9 Nov 2022, 2:07 am by jonathanturley
While largely lost in election day coverage, United States District Judge James Boasberg dismissed the much heralded case of retired Army Lt. [read post]
9 May 2011, 6:39 am by Calvin Massey
  United States Policy With Respect to Jerusalem as the Capital of Israel. [read post]
28 Jun 2018, 10:36 am by Kent Scheidegger
"  So said the United States Supreme Court today in Sexton v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 6:35 am
If you teach in the United States, you have that obligation! [read post]
8 Jun 2010, 12:58 pm by Jonathan H. Adler
United States, which begins: The owners of a Sudanese pharmaceutical plant sued the United States for unjustifiably destroying the plant, failing to compensate them for its destruction, and defaming them by asserting they had ties to Osama bin Laden. [read post]
2 Sep 2008, 3:23 pm
"We continue to assume that the Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution requires a speedy sentencing and find that the sentencing delay in this case violated [Clinton H.] [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am by Ann Tweedy
  The case was distributed on January 30 for a February 15 conference, and thereafter the Solicitor General was invited to present the views of the United States, which he has not yet done. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 4:56 pm
Nevertheless, rulemaking without prior comment has increased across a wide range of agencies, a trend that may be strong enough to persist despite the Supreme Court's 2001 decision in United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2018, 5:24 am
 Here are the official positions of each party:The Republicans aver that the Democrats, sensing weakness, refused to approve a reasonable spending bill until the Republicans and Trump agreed to 1) Let all Mexicans who have criminal records into the United States with fast access to becoming citizens. [read post]