Search for: "United States v. Lowe's Inc"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,151
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:40 am
American Traffic Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
(A case pending in front of the United States Supreme Court may answer this question. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:38 am
The second, Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:50 am
United States Fid. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 2:00 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 9:39 am
California Building Industry Assn. v City of San Jose, S212072 (June 15, 2015) involved Plaintiff trade association’s challenge to Defendant City’s ordinance to require developments containing 20 or more units to make 15% of those units available for low or moderate income purchase. [read post]
25 Jan 2018, 4:04 pm
ABC News v Beef Products Inc, “The Pink Slime case” (United States) ABC News and Beef Products Inc. reached a $177m million settlement after the news outlets report in 2012 that the food production company made low-cost processed beef that equated to “pink slime”. [read post]
12 Sep 2019, 1:02 pm
Under Title III of that act, United States citizens who had their property confiscated by the Castro regime were given the right to file suit against those who traffic in such properties (See Libertad Act §§ 301-306). [read post]
13 Aug 2014, 12:14 pm
Practice Tip: The United States Supreme Court addressed the elements required for trade dress to be protected in Two Pesos, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:49 am
United Parcel Service, Inc., A-86/87-11, 2013 WL 3716939 (N.J. [read post]
1 Feb 2021, 12:12 pm
Gongos, Inc., 2019 WL 1594046 (E.D. [read post]
18 Feb 2012, 5:49 pm
Shearson/American Express, Inc., 490 U. [read post]
22 Jul 2014, 5:14 am
Note in Nautilus, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Mar 2022, 9:57 am
In Advisers, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Oct 2017, 7:01 am
H Unit Five, Inc., 2017 WL 4271433 (D. [read post]
