Search for: "United States v. Lowe's Inc"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,240
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Aug 2012, 1:24 pm
" Petitioners -- the State of Texas; the Chamber of Commerce of the United States; and representatives of nationwide manufacturing, chemical and petroleum industries -- petition for review of the EPA's action under the Administrative Procedure Act. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
The third case, United States v. [read post]
29 Aug 2018, 7:03 am
Wayfair that South Dakota can require collection of its sales tax on sales to its residents by out-of-state internet retailers.[2] The 5 to 4 decision overruled two earlier precedents, National Bellas Hess, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Sep 2018, 8:00 am
” Energy Reserves Group, Inc. v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 6:11 am
Plata and Citizens United v. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 8:43 am
The Court called for the views of the Solicitor General in the following cases: DIRECTV, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2007, 10:18 am
In Nightlight Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
18 Mar 2009, 4:42 pm
Supreme Court's recent decision in Altria Group, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Jan 2010, 8:39 am
However, as discussed in my previous post (here), this very line of reasoning was deemed an abuse of discretion by the Ninth Circuit in United Steel v. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
10 May 2024, 9:00 am
Although this Court's review is limited to reviewing facts contained in the record (see Matter of Jorling v Adirondack Park Agency, 214 AD3d 98, 101-102 [3d Dept 2023]), we find that respondents' footnote was a permissible statement and argument encompassing the applicable statutory and regulatory authorities governing the handling of an incomplete permit application (see Reed v New York State Elec. [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 2:18 am
The absence of a hyphen made no substantive difference in Chernow Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2011, 5:40 am
American Traffic Solutions, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 9:15 am
(A case pending in front of the United States Supreme Court may answer this question. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 4:27 pm
(United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2010, 6:33 am
Capone v. [read post]
14 Aug 2019, 4:07 am
Supreme Court for argument time to support a challenge to New York City gun restrictions,” New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 3:42 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:38 am
The second, Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 8:50 am
United States Fid. [read post]
