Search for: "United States v. McDonnell" Results 141 - 160 of 289
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Apr 2010, 11:19 am by JB
It places one of the key holdings of Dred Scott v. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 6:41 am by Andrew Breidenbach
Michael Doyle of McClatchy Newspapers tells the “long-shot” story of United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2016, 4:00 am by The Public Employment Law Press
" But even if they were compelled, he adequately waived his Garrityprotections, United States v. [read post]
14 Sep 2019, 7:38 am by Gordon Ahl
District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia in Elhady v. [read post]
9 Oct 2024, 12:26 pm by Mavrick Law Firm
Federal courts have a well-established burden shifting test to analyze claims of discrimination under the landmark decision McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 5:19 am by Amy Howe
United States, characterizing it as “one of several recent signs that ideology does not always fuel the justices’ decisions. [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Plaintiff, acting pro se in this appeal, challenged a federal district court's granting his former employer, the Syracuse Regional Airport Authority [SRAA], summary judgment in response to Plaintiff's allegations of unlawful discrimination and retaliation.The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, noting that summary judgment is proper "only when, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant'" and "there… [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The Plaintiff, acting pro se in this appeal, challenged a federal district court's granting his former employer, the Syracuse Regional Airport Authority [SRAA], summary judgment in response to Plaintiff's allegations of unlawful discrimination and retaliation.The United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, noting that summary judgment is proper "only when, construing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-movant'" and "there… [read post]
7 Aug 2015, 6:10 am
Plaintiff is Caucasian and a Canadian citizen with Permanent Resident status in the United States. . . . [read post]
22 Jul 2019, 4:25 am by Lisa Rodgers
The Court of Appeal disagreed, stating that the important consideration was not the sufficient British connection between the employer and employee for the purposes of employment law, but rather the connection between the co-workers. [read post]
26 Oct 2018, 11:16 am by Thomas DeLorenzo
United States held that the jury instructions in their original conviction were in error and a retrial was ordered. [read post]