Search for: "United States v. Smart"
Results 141 - 160
of 1,132
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2024, 12:11 pm
• What good practices of smart mixes can be found in the actions of States, businesses, and other stakeholders? [read post]
26 Oct 2022, 12:06 pm
United States Patent No. 10.046.222, entitled “System and Method for Controlling a Bicycle Trainer” was issued by the United States Patent and Trademark Office on August 14, 2018. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 8:24 am
United States, No. 19-783 (U.S. [read post]
10 Jun 2021, 4:43 pm
United States, No. 19-783, 2021 WL 2229206 (U.S. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 9:28 am
On June 16, the Supreme Court issued an 8-1 ruling in United States, ex rel. [read post]
31 May 2007, 3:11 pm
Congress could have expressly limited the Rule's application to specific acts, but it did not do so.On part two Judge Baker found error, but ultimately held no prejudice under the constitutional standard (harmless beyond a reasonable doubt), citing United States v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 8:06 am
Cover of Chubby Checker"Let's Twist Again," is the battle cry of 71-year-old Rock 'n Roll legend Chubby Checker after United States District Court for the Northern District of California Judge William H. [read post]
15 Jan 2023, 10:05 am
Kleist, Immunity for Multilateral Development Banks in the United States: Assessing Litigation Exposure Following the U.S. [read post]
6 Feb 2013, 8:42 am
In Creely v. [read post]
18 Jan 2022, 10:53 pm
This is a monumental patent dispute (that has all the ingredients for further escalation), so litigation watchers like me have to put the mosaic together step by step.This is the current landscape of Ericsson-Apple cases pending in the United States, just so we have a forest here and not just a lot of trees:FRAND actionsEricsson v. [read post]
31 Dec 2018, 12:10 pm
In Naperville Smart Meter Awareness v. [read post]
15 Dec 2009, 9:10 am
United States v. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:00 am
Smart phones and tablet computers are the central focus of the famous legal dispute between technology moguls, Apple and Samsung. [read post]
5 May 2015, 1:34 pm
The case is United States v. [read post]
26 Jul 2017, 8:01 am
During a one-hour interview on Wednesday in New Zealand, Chief Justice of the United States John G. [read post]
19 Jul 2022, 11:39 am
Apple has very high shares in the smartphone, tablet, or smart watch markets in the United States, the geography the lawsuit focuses on, and does not allow other payment apps (particularly "wallet" apps) to use the iPhone's NFC chip. [read post]
2 Aug 2022, 12:41 pm
The headline of this post would have begun with "Northern DisGRACE of California" or "Total Disaster of California" if I didn't have the greatest respect for the United States District Court for the Northern District of California as an institution--and for all the judges there who work incredibly hard and smart. [read post]
12 Jun 2009, 10:34 am
Anyone interested in seeing how a very smart judge can write the equivalent of a treatise in nine pages should read Frank Easterbrook's opinion in National Rifle Association of America v. [read post]
25 Jun 2014, 6:35 pm
California and United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2019, 9:17 am
Both place their faith in the state, and in the community, to be sure. [read post]
