Search for: "United States v. Sosa"
Results 141 - 160
of 178
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Apr 2013, 4:57 pm
First, according to the Court in the Kiobel decision, ATS cases are subject to the presumption against extraterritoriality recently rearticulated in Morrison v. [read post]
17 Aug 2010, 6:11 pm
by Julian Ku In the first U.S. court opinion on piracy since 1820, a U.S. judge in Norfolk, Virginia has dismissed piracy charges against Somali defendants in United States v. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 2:25 pm
On the one hand, I think the ATS needs to be sharply reined in - I agree more or less with Judge Kavanaugh's dissent in the DC Circuit panel, that the ATS properly applied is limited to conduct within the territorial United States. [read post]
7 Mar 2012, 7:09 am
And in Sosa v. [read post]
23 Jul 2012, 5:20 am
These governments argued that: [T]he right of the United States or any other sovereign to create and enforce such a domestic remedy depends on it being able to satisfy the proper jurisdictional limits recognized by international law. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 5:17 am
The ATS provides that “district courts shall have original jurisdiction of any civil action by an alien for a tort only, committed in violation of the law of nations or a treaty of the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2017, 1:17 pm
Moreover, the causes of action under the ATS, the Supreme Court’s 2004 language in Sosa v. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 4:45 pm
See United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2012, 10:12 am
The same point can be made regarding Sosa v. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 11:22 pm
Yanez Sosa). [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 7:57 am
In Sosa v. [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 3:01 pm
Is it an autonomous community, like a nation-state? [read post]
27 Oct 2022, 5:55 am
Starting in 2004 with the decision in Sosa v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 9:53 pm
As in Empagran, the Court may say that even if the claim has a connection with the United States, the connection must be strong enough to make the exercise of jurisdiction not “unreasonable. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:01 am
In AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 1:55 pm
T.M.H., Appellant, v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 10:47 am
United States, 802 F.Supp.2d 834 (W.D. [read post]
20 Aug 2015, 11:17 am
United States. [read post]
30 Nov 2009, 9:53 am
It was also settled before the case could be heard by a jury at the state level. [read post]
20 May 2011, 7:42 pm
Lohengrin Revealed: The Implications of Sosa v. [read post]
