Search for: "United States v. Sweet"
Results 141 - 160
of 418
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Oct 2011, 1:25 pm
The United States indeed went to the moon, and a few years later the U.S. [read post]
12 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Erwin Griswold, Law and Lawyers in the United States, 65 (Cambridge, Harv. [read post]
13 Apr 2012, 2:22 pm
" United States v. [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 6:49 am
The Court then continued to assess the evidence, and concluded that the shape of the KitKat chocolate bar had acquired distinctive character through use in Denmark, Germany, Spain, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom, but that the Board of Appeal could not validly conclude its examination of the distinctive character acquired by the contested trade mark throughout the European Union on the basis of the percentage of the public recognising that… [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 4:38 pm
This Guide was compiled by United Cerebral Palsy as a comprehensive Guide for cerebral palsy. [read post]
20 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
In Maxwood v. [read post]
16 Jul 2015, 7:59 am
Gosbee v. [read post]
13 Sep 2019, 11:26 am
Respondents conceded that they are not connected to Petitioner in any way.Finally, the evidence established that SCHIEDMAYER is famous in the United States in connection with keyboard musical instruments. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 7:58 am
United States, 11-5683, and Hill v. [read post]
3 Dec 2019, 12:33 pm
The latter is an issue that two automotive industry bodies have raised in a filing with the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit.For a list of previous posts on amicus curiae briefs in FTC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2008, 1:31 pm
United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:01 pm
Section One straightforwardly provides: The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of sex.Moving beyond the bare text, it is important, even (maybe especially) a hundred years later, to think more about what the Amendment really sought to constitutionally accomplish, and how its full import has not been deeply understood. [read post]
18 Mar 2010, 10:00 am
Indeed, the United States argues that “Officer Perez . . . did not know that he had a duty to diligently pursue the drafting and eventual approval of the warrant by a detached magistrate. [read post]
19 Jul 2013, 9:00 am
Unilever US, Inc., decided by the United States District Court for the Northern District of California on July 9. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 8:36 am
United States v. 300 Units of Rentable Housing, Case No. 09-35990 (9th Cir. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
17 Nov 2023, 8:44 am
GmbH v. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 5:00 am
§337(a), which states:“[A]ll such proceedings for the enforcement, or to restrain violations, of this chapter [the entire FDCA] shall be by and in the name of the United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 9:25 am
It's a 74 page note by Anne Gilson LaLonde on the protection in the United States of foreign trade marks that are well known in the US but aren't actually being used there. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 2:30 pm
That was after he’d seen a brief Sungaila had filed in a domestic-violence-related lawsuit against the United States before the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights. [read post]
