Search for: "WELLS v. MAYER" Results 141 - 160 of 406
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2015, 11:31 am by Schachtman
Olah, “My Search for Carbocations and Their Role in Chemistry,” Nobel Lecture (Dec. 8, 1994), quoting George von Békésy, Experiments in Hearing 8 (N.Y. 1960); see also McMillan v. [read post]
30 Apr 2015, 7:17 am by Daphne Keller
European courts are beginning to sort through one of the most important follow-up questions to last spring’s “Right To Be Forgotten” ruling in Google v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 2:16 am by Kevin LaCroix
In yet another U.S. securities class action lawsuit involving a non-U.S. company and a corruption investigation in the company’s home country, on March 19, 2015 a shareholder of Chemical & Mining Company of Chile, Inc. [read post]
3 Mar 2015, 10:00 pm by Jan von Hein
Deviation from German substantive law Commercial as well as altruistic surrogacy are prohibited under § 1(1) No. 7 German Embryo Protection Act and § 14b Adoption Placement Act, which penalize the undertaking of surrogacy and commercial activities promoting surrogacy such as placement of surrogate mothers. [read post]
29 Dec 2014, 9:08 pm
Category: Infringement    By: Christian Hannon, Contributor   TitleAzure Networks v. [read post]
18 Dec 2014, 8:10 am by Lale Kemal (UK)
Deutsches Patent- und Markenamt (Case C-273/00) [2002] ECR I-11737; Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Lion Corporation’, Community trade mark application No. 143 891, Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Case R 781/1999-4; Edgar Rice Burroughs Inc v OHIM (R708/2006-4). [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:12 pm by LTA-Editor
Hopefully, the new guidelines that the PTO plans to issue, as well as new Federal Circuit cases (DDR Holdings v. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 12:12 pm by LTA-Editor
Hopefully, the new guidelines that the PTO plans to issue, as well as new Federal Circuit cases (DDR Holdings v. [read post]
17 Nov 2014, 5:16 am by Jim Singer
” Fast forward to 2014, after the United States Supreme Court issued its decision in Alice v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 9:17 am by Lawrence B. Ebert
Judge Mayer dissented on the claim interpretation portion of the opinion. [read post]