Search for: "Ward v. Smith" Results 141 - 160 of 234
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
12 Jan 2022, 12:35 pm by John Elwood
Smith, and if so, whether the Supreme Court should overrule Smith. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
10 Nov 2011, 1:42 am by NL
In Say v Smith (1563) Plowd 269, 272, Anthony Brown J said that “every contract sufficient to make a lease for years ought to have certainty in three limitations, viz in the commencement of the term, in the continuance of it, and in the end of it … and words in a lease, which don’t make this appear, are but babble.”25. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:10 pm
It's Canary Wharf Group Ltd v Comptroller General of Patents, Designs and Trade Marks [2015] EWHC 1588 (Ch), an 8 June Chancery Division, England and Wales, decision of Iain Purvis QC, sitting as a Deputy Judge of the High Court on an appeal from the UK Intellectual Property Office. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 12:13 am
PUBLISHED OPINIONS Opinion Short Title/District 08a0415p.06  Smith v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Smith v ADVFN plc & Ors [2010] EWHC 3255 (QB) – 13 Dec 2010 (Tugendhat J). [read post]
19 Jul 2015, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
  This was the fifth libel case of 2015 – so far the claimants have won two and the defendants have won three (for the others see our post on Starr v Ward). [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 9:08 am by Bianca Saad
” Specifically, it was stipulated among parties that Smith’s websites would express and communicate ideas, primarily those that “celebrate and promote the couple’s wedding and unique love story” and those that “celebrat[e] and promot[e]” what Smith understands to be marriage. [read post]
28 Nov 2010, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
On Friday 3 December 2010 an application in the case of Smith v ADVN (No.9) will be heard by Mr Justice Tugendhat Reserved Judgments The following reserved judgments after public hearings remain outstanding: Clift v Slough BC heard 23 and 24 June 2010 (Ward, Thomas and Richards LJ [read post]