Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 141 - 160
of 6,820
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jun 2010, 3:03 pm
Should I tell the client I don't think he's going to jail when I know the judge he's before always puts defendants in jail for the same crime? [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Finding many reasons for staying the stare decisis course and no “special justification” for departing from it, we decline Kimble’s invitation to overrule Brulotte.I don't agree though -- if something is wrong, you have a great responsibility to fix it, not to stick to stare decisis. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:51 am
We younger-generation public defenders don't really frequent the same social circles as the older, more established attorneys do. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:16 pm
It will be fun to watch her deal with her former colleagues when they don't grant a continuance or agree on an evidentiary point. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:15 am
But even the Defendant's lawyer wasn't sure if it was. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:36 pm
We don't mingle with hoi polloi, but we sometimes visit and observe. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:44 am
" In other words, the defendants basically said "we'll see your 175 paragraphs and raise you another 845. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
The introductory two paragraphs on page 7 of that opinion that discuss the history of Rule 11 and why we (rightly) don't allow the trial judge to participate in plea negotiations don't seem dispositive of whether we should allow some other judge to do so. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:08 am
The First Amendment doesn't apply to lawyers who blog. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:46 am
We are talking about it all the time, but I don’t think we are doing very well and I don’t think the way we are talking about it is advancing the cause of condemning such violence and of making people safer. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
"So even if the total sentence is unreasonable, there's nothing the judiciary can do about it.Look, you'll have a hard time arguing that it violates the Eighth Amendment to say that 50 years for a series of bank robberies in necessarily cruel and unusual; i.e., so unreasonable that it's a violation of the Constitution.But when history looks back and judges the way we punish people, I don't think that… [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
Don't want you to think I've forgotten about these. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:19 pm
Tell us something we don't know. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 8:20 pm
If a judge finds that gays have a right to marry, people don't even need to read the opinion before declaring it activism. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:45 am
Or, from the police perspective, we're heros just trying to protect law-abiding people despite those activist criminal-coddling judges who don't realize that freedom isn't free. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:54 pm
We don't know much about this claim except that the individual defendants are the same age as plaintiff. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:17 pm
via www.theepochtimes.com I don't imagine this is going to do the prosecutor's case any good. [read post]
14 Dec 2019, 7:26 am
" Or that a prosecutor will engage in a liason that will end with pillow talk "we really don't turn over everything we are supposed to in discovery, but don't tell anyone. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 9:47 am
We don't have enough political clout for a bailout. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:45 am
Take the cell number, but just don't use it to text messages about cases. [read post]
