Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 141 - 160
of 6,879
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2018, 5:02 am
This wasn't a case of rogue magistrates denying bond without the knowledge of the judges. [read post]
24 Jun 2024, 8:52 am
We need more judges who don't just knee-jerk for the government in every case. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Finding many reasons for staying the stare decisis course and no “special justification” for departing from it, we decline Kimble’s invitation to overrule Brulotte.I don't agree though -- if something is wrong, you have a great responsibility to fix it, not to stick to stare decisis. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:51 am
We younger-generation public defenders don't really frequent the same social circles as the older, more established attorneys do. [read post]
18 Oct 2016, 7:46 am
We are talking about it all the time, but I don’t think we are doing very well and I don’t think the way we are talking about it is advancing the cause of condemning such violence and of making people safer. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:15 am
But even the Defendant's lawyer wasn't sure if it was. [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:16 pm
It will be fun to watch her deal with her former colleagues when they don't grant a continuance or agree on an evidentiary point. [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:44 am
" In other words, the defendants basically said "we'll see your 175 paragraphs and raise you another 845. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:36 pm
We don't mingle with hoi polloi, but we sometimes visit and observe. [read post]
24 May 2010, 6:08 am
The First Amendment doesn't apply to lawyers who blog. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
The introductory two paragraphs on page 7 of that opinion that discuss the history of Rule 11 and why we (rightly) don't allow the trial judge to participate in plea negotiations don't seem dispositive of whether we should allow some other judge to do so. [read post]
27 Feb 2008, 7:18 am
Don't want you to think I've forgotten about these. [read post]
21 Dec 2016, 1:03 pm
"So even if the total sentence is unreasonable, there's nothing the judiciary can do about it.Look, you'll have a hard time arguing that it violates the Eighth Amendment to say that 50 years for a series of bank robberies in necessarily cruel and unusual; i.e., so unreasonable that it's a violation of the Constitution.But when history looks back and judges the way we punish people, I don't think that… [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 8:20 pm
If a judge finds that gays have a right to marry, people don't even need to read the opinion before declaring it activism. [read post]
31 Oct 2008, 7:45 am
Or, from the police perspective, we're heros just trying to protect law-abiding people despite those activist criminal-coddling judges who don't realize that freedom isn't free. [read post]
21 Apr 2014, 4:19 pm
Tell us something we don't know. [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 5:17 pm
via www.theepochtimes.com I don't imagine this is going to do the prosecutor's case any good. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 2:45 am
Take the cell number, but just don't use it to text messages about cases. [read post]
28 Feb 2009, 9:47 am
We don't have enough political clout for a bailout. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 12:40 pm
We need to take these flu outbreaks more seriously, but we don't, and mark our words, we will pay the price. [read post]
