Search for: "We Don't Judge - We Defend"
Results 141 - 160
of 7,499
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Aug 2010, 11:48 am
Carothers replied "Because we don't have the money. [read post]
24 Feb 2018, 5:02 am
This wasn't a case of rogue magistrates denying bond without the knowledge of the judges. [read post]
3 Mar 2008, 6:01 am
I don't regularly blog on probation-revocation appeals, but thought this was timely given Judge Pilshaw's recent and repeated disciplinary record (blogged about here and here). [read post]
27 Dec 2006, 2:10 pm
Also, we don't get want to get sued by the famously litigious* Professor Steinbuch. [read post]
30 May 2014, 1:28 pm
I just don't think that narrative of second chance really supports a universal right of this kind. [read post]
16 Jun 2007, 1:11 pm
Liberals want to permit plaintiffs to sue; conservatives believe in federalism, and so don't think the federal government should lightly override state law. [read post]
11 Aug 2015, 11:46 am
We don't yet know what's missing, but judge for yourself what it shows.) [read post]
14 May 2021, 7:16 pm
It will be fun to watch her deal with her former colleagues when they don't grant a continuance or agree on an evidentiary point. [read post]
3 Jan 2008, 10:10 pm
Message to Snake Oil salespeople -- don't expect any breaks from Seventh Circuit Judge Frank Easterbrook. [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 7:22 am
Finding many reasons for staying the stare decisis course and no “special justification” for departing from it, we decline Kimble’s invitation to overrule Brulotte.I don't agree though -- if something is wrong, you have a great responsibility to fix it, not to stick to stare decisis. [read post]
5 Mar 2009, 7:53 am
I don't mean the "result" in terms of guaranteeing the outcome in violation of the ethics code. [read post]
18 Aug 2008, 3:08 pm
(We don't know whether he wants to be identified, so we're not publishing his name, but the words below are not ours.)In light of the continued interest in pre-service removal cases, note that both Valerio v. [read post]
17 May 2009, 8:50 am
We are now saying that you don't have the right to refuse. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 11:15 am
But even the Defendant's lawyer wasn't sure if it was. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 3:03 pm
Should I tell the client I don't think he's going to jail when I know the judge he's before always puts defendants in jail for the same crime? [read post]
31 Mar 2015, 9:44 am
" In other words, the defendants basically said "we'll see your 175 paragraphs and raise you another 845. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 5:36 pm
We don't mingle with hoi polloi, but we sometimes visit and observe. [read post]
14 Sep 2015, 3:19 pm
The introductory two paragraphs on page 7 of that opinion that discuss the history of Rule 11 and why we (rightly) don't allow the trial judge to participate in plea negotiations don't seem dispositive of whether we should allow some other judge to do so. [read post]
10 Feb 2007, 6:51 am
We younger-generation public defenders don't really frequent the same social circles as the older, more established attorneys do. [read post]
6 Dec 2017, 2:54 pm
We don't know much about this claim except that the individual defendants are the same age as plaintiff. [read post]
