Search for: "Wilson & Co., Inc. v. United States" Results 141 - 160 of 224
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Wilson, dissenting, is set out in Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 2022 NY Slip Op 01953, decided on March 22, 2022. [read post]
28 Mar 2022, 7:30 am by Public Employment Law Press
Wilson, dissenting, is set out in Ferreira v City of Binghamton, 2022 NY Slip Op 01953, decided on March 22, 2022. [read post]
2 Jan 2024, 2:13 am by Robin E. Kobayashi
Felix Manufacturing Inc., Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company, Allianz Insurance Company, Defendants, 2023 Cal. [read post]
1 Mar 2018, 7:06 am by John Elwood
As always happens, just as soon as I say “it’s about time for us to be seeing opinions of some sort” in the repeatedly relisted cases, the court instead granted outright, in the thrice-relisted New Prime Inc. v. [read post]
19 Nov 2009, 12:05 pm by Erin Miller
Case(s) in which the Solicitor General has recently filed a brief for the United States, as directed by the Court: Docket: 08-1191 Title: Morrison v. [read post]
3 May 2007, 10:20 am
It is also ultra vires under well-established law.The seminal case applying the municipal cost recovery rule (sometimes also called the "free public services doctrine") is a sixty-year old Supreme Court case called United States v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Coca-Cola Co., 573 U.S. ___ (2014); Buckman Co. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 1:01 pm by Ad Law Defense
Coca-Cola Co., 573 U.S. ___ (2014); Buckman Co. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 3:25 pm
Pratt    Western District of Tennessee at MemphisCRIMINAL 08a0052p.06 Wilson v. [read post]
20 Dec 2012, 7:00 am by James F. Aspell
Instead of an increase in cost per treatment or per unit cost of a service such as a doctor’s visit, it is the amount of services and the types of services being used driving medical inflation. [read post]
28 Jun 2013, 10:09 am by Don Cruse
NANCI WILSON, CBS STATIONS GROUP OF TEXAS, L.P., D/B/A KEYE-TV AND VIACOM, INC., No. 11-0228 Opinion of the Court Dissenting The Court revisited its earlier decision in McIlvain v. [read post]