Search for: "Character v. State"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 6,778
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jan 2015, 10:52 am
State Water Contractors v. [read post]
14 Apr 2010, 5:41 am
March 15, 2010 Nealon, J.)In the case of Florimonte v. [read post]
9 Nov 2014, 6:46 pm
United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 12:46 pm
First National State Bank of New Jersey, 87 N.J. 163, 75-76 (1981). [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 8:33 am
First National State Bank of New Jersey, 87 N.J. 163, 75-76 (1981). [read post]
10 Apr 2015, 12:40 pm
The Court is not unmindful that this analysis appears to be at odds with the Court of Appeals decision in People v Rodriguez (68 NY2d 674 [1986], revg for reasons stated in dissenting opn of Lazer, J., 113 AD2d 337, 343-348 [2d Dept 1985]). [read post]
18 Mar 2012, 6:07 pm
To determine where the subject vehicle originates from, check the first digit of the seventeen character VIN. [read post]
4 Feb 2024, 6:29 pm
” 395 U.S. at 447; see also Counterman v. [read post]
13 Jul 2007, 10:19 am
State of Indiana (NFP) Toby Mullis v. [read post]
29 Sep 2017, 12:21 pm
Hill v. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 8:31 am
Thus, for example, at the time of the creation of the RRS and the RNWF, "A deputy finance minister, Dmitry V. [read post]
20 Jul 2010, 11:19 am
This view of the Constitution was enshrined by the Supreme Court in 1819, in the case McCollough v. [read post]
26 Jan 2014, 9:54 am
While the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit gave every indication at a December hearing that the grossly erroneous non-copyrightability holding in Oracle v. [read post]
14 Jun 2013, 2:21 pm
The case was remanded for further proceedings.Read More: Appeals court rules Oklahoma license plate suit has meritUnited States v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 7:49 am
In Donohue v. [read post]
27 May 2016, 3:48 am
This can extend to the names of characters portrayed by an individual, as occurred in the case of McFarland v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 2:51 am
Said the Court, the high rating position of links to the CTM proprietor’s website could be justified in the light of the earlier mark’s well-known character in the United States; they did not show that EU consumers were familiar with the earlier mark, given that no evidence was provided of its market share, of how intensive, geographically widespread and long-standing its use was, of the investment in its promotion and of how significant a portion of the… [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 7:48 am
Finally, ‘in assessing whether a trade mark has acquired a distinctive character the competent authority must make an overall assessment of the relevant evidence’. [read post]
24 Apr 2015, 3:01 pm
Case Citation: Sweet v. [read post]
29 Jul 2008, 8:35 pm
Tolub of State Supreme Court in Manhattan, ruled on June 24 in AVA a/k/a Maximilia Cordero v. [read post]
