Search for: "Doe v. Doe"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 137,831
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Oct 2014, 5:15 am
”* Such personnel regulations have the force and effect of law.** See, for example, Gordon v Town of Queensbury, 256 AD2d 784. [read post]
14 Dec 2008, 5:24 pm
" In Manders v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 8:45 am
Shadescrest Health Care Center v. [read post]
15 Oct 2008, 8:46 am
Yesterday, the Supreme Court heard argument in Bartlett v. [read post]
15 Feb 2014, 3:31 am
The case is Svensson and Others v Retriever Sverige AB Case C‑466/12, where a group of journalists writing for the the Göteborgs-Posten newspaper’s website sued Retriever Sverige, a commercial indexing service which provides its clients with links to articles published by other websites. [read post]
26 Nov 2011, 10:16 am
And while there is no single case that does for criminal law what Seinfeld does for life, Terry v. [read post]
4 Dec 2024, 7:00 am
(Portico Management Group, LLC v. [read post]
10 Aug 2024, 5:45 am
In the 2001 case of Medina v. [read post]
11 Nov 2012, 6:41 pm
Nor does the panel reference the leading decisions on what constitutes sexual harassment arising from a single incident, consider the following cases: in Romano v. 1577118 Ontario Inc. [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 8:32 pm
Bytska v. [read post]
27 Feb 2017, 1:52 pm
Election Comm’n v. [read post]
12 Dec 2006, 1:26 pm
Davey v. [read post]
2 Apr 2020, 10:01 am
India unlike civil law countries like the United States[2], Germany[3] and France[4] does not codify the definition of force majeure into any legislation. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 6:23 am
Citation really does matter in the real world. [read post]
4 Sep 2015, 11:05 am
Facts of the Case In the recent case of Tucker v. [read post]
1 Nov 2009, 9:00 pm
Last Friday, Maryland's intermediate appellate court treated the Supreme Court's Heller opinion as doing nothing to change the Maryland Court of Special Appeals' 2005 ruling that the Second Amendment does not apply to the states. blank">Williams v. [read post]
22 Apr 2021, 7:39 am
Corp. v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 7:32 am
., Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 3:35 am
”This is the case even if the new “final determination” confirms the original administrative decision [see Raykowski v NYC DOT, 259 A.D.2d 367]. [read post]
11 Sep 2024, 8:03 pm
Lundbeck A/S v. [read post]
