Search for: "English v. English"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 9,875
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Jul 2023, 5:19 am
Drazen v. [read post]
11 Aug 2022, 8:26 am
On 4 August 2022, the English Patents court handed down its decision in Shenzhen Carku Technology Co., Ltd v The NOCO Company, a case on battery-powered car jump starters. [read post]
17 Nov 2009, 11:46 am
 (Holder v. [read post]
25 May 2009, 4:24 am
In Franks v. [read post]
10 Mar 2012, 6:09 pm
This was hinted at as far back as Bunt v Tilley (very briefly), then in Kaschke v Gray and considered most recently in Davison v Habeeb – but Tamiz is the clearest example yet (albeit still as a dismissal at an early stage of proceedings). [read post]
1 Mar 2017, 2:47 am
Similarly, the requirement to provide security could not be justified by reference to general English procedural rules. [read post]
26 May 2021, 4:00 am
Each Wednesday we tell you which three English-language cases and which French-language case have been the most viewed* on CanLII and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 2:49 am
Harding v Wealands [2007] 1 AC 1, under the pre-existing English rules of applicable law). [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 5:35 am
Cuthbertson v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 4:00 am
Each Wednesday we tell you which three English-language cases and which French-language case have been the most viewed* on CanLII and we give you a small sense of what the cases are about. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 4:00 am
For this last week: Pro Sys Consultants Ltd. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2016, 4:00 am
Jackson v Mayerle, 2016 ONSC 1556 8. [read post]
16 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
Ahluwalia v. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 3:42 am
Special considerations apply to the assessment of damages in libel actions in Canada where the language in the publication was not English or French. [read post]
31 Mar 2014, 4:36 pm
Mitchell v. [read post]
22 Jul 2011, 3:12 pm
Section 31 of the Civil Judgments and Jurisdiction Act 1982 provides a further exception, namely that foreign judgments against a sovereign state would be enforceable through the English courts if two conditions were met: (a) the state in question would not have been immune if English laws were applied (i.e. the SIA 78), and (b) the judgment would otherwise satisfy the criteria for enforceability under English law. 3. [read post]
27 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
(Eugene Volokh) The case, Yemshaw v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 1:01 pm
As you probably do not recall (or never knew), in Taniguchi v. [read post]
