Search for: "Matter of Mark T." Results 1581 - 1600 of 16,583
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Oct 2007, 3:59 am
Today marks the first anniversary of this blog's launch. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 5:07 am
"].July 26, 2017 - 11 AM: In re Iron Hill Brewery, LLC, Serial No. 86684857 [Section 2(d) refusal of CRUSHER for "beer" in view of the registered mark THE CRUSHER for "wines"].July 26, 2017 - 2 PM:  In re Handbag Republic Inc., Serial No. 86760580 [Section 2(d) refusal of TWENTY NINE for "handbags" in view of the registered mark 29 (Stylized) for "book bags, backpacks, duffle bags and tote bags"].July 27, 2017 - 2 PM:  In re… [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:59 am
Stop pretending that the scum populating the internet don't matter to you. [read post]
28 Oct 2010, 6:00 am
  Seems simple and yet lawyers are routinely needed to resolve these matters. [read post]
11 Nov 2011, 3:48 am by John L. Welch
If Bata has indeed abandoned the mark, wouldn't the public interest be served by allowing a petition for cancellation? [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 12:50 am
We aren’t going back, no matter how nostalgic we may be for what was. [read post]
11 May 2023, 6:09 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
In the period marked by our now-annual State of Crypto report, it would be easy for a casual observer to overlook the rapid progress the crypto industry is making. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 3:31 am by John L. Welch
[T]he presence of the parties' respective goods in the same store does not necessarily lead to the conclusion that confusion would arise. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 11:14 am
§ 1052, registration of a mark may be denied if that mark "Consists of or comprises immoral, deceptive, or scandalous matter; or matter which may disparage or falsely suggest a connection with persons, living or dead, institutions, beliefs, or national symbols, or bring them into contempt, or disrepute. [read post]
9 May 2014, 6:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
’”  This overwhelmed the facts that the parties sold similar products through the same marketing channels and that Falcon’s mark was arbitrary (all things which would be true no matter which competitor Falcon sued). [read post]
18 Jun 2015, 1:22 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  Because of the forfeiture of rights involved, showing naked licensing requires a “high burden of proof,” though the court declined to say whether that required clear and convincing evidence or merely a preponderance; the difference didn’t matter here. [read post]
2 Mar 2022, 8:11 am by Dan Bressler
“NRA Wants Dorsey & Whitney DQ’d From Ad Agency Suit” — “The NRA claimed in a motion Monday that a privilege log recently revealed that Dorsey & Whitney LLP worked briefly with Virginia lawyer Mark Dycio, who had advised the association on matters relevant to the case. [read post]