Search for: "State v. Case"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 175,967
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
16 Jan 2015, 3:36 pm
There is one actual criminal case, McFadden v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:46 am
What about State v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 11:46 am
What about State v. [read post]
4 Mar 2012, 8:54 am
Phil Cave briefly covered CAAF’s January opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Dec 2020, 9:22 am
Case citation: State Farm Fire and Casualty Company v. [read post]
5 Sep 2017, 8:07 am
Continue reading The post Recent Florida Supreme Court case law update – Hess v. [read post]
16 Feb 2010, 3:33 am
” WLR Daily, 15th February 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
22 Mar 2010, 3:37 am
” WLR Daily, 19th March 2010 Source: www.lawreports.co.uk Please note once a case has been fully reported in one of the ICLR series the corresponding WLR Daily summary is removed. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 3:49 am
Regina (Medical Justice) v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWCA Civ 269; [2011] WLR (D) 95 “Where a party sought permission to appeal from a judge and permission was granted on terms, that party had no right to appeal against those terms by reason of section 54(4) of the Access to Justice Act 1999, unless the party concerned was not present at the permission hearing at which the terms were imposed. [read post]
26 Oct 2010, 3:08 am
Regina (Oakes) v Secretary of State for Justice and others [2010] EWCA Civ 1169; [2010] WLR(D) 267 “The different wording of the tests to be applied when considering the suitability for automatic release of a prisoner who had been recalled to prison for breaching the terms of his licence, under ss 255A(5) and 255C(3) of the Criminal Justice Act 2003 (as inserted by section 29(2) of the Criminal Justice and Immigration Act 2008) was deliberate. [read post]
10 Nov 2009, 9:39 am
Naturally, the state supreme court will still have to consider the case, since there is a Nebraska Court of Appeals opinion on the books, and the court needs to decide what to do with it. [read post]
10 May 2012, 5:48 am
The law The issue of whether a claimant with an otherwise valid claim who substantially exaggerates that claim should lose their right to damages was considered by the Court of Appeal in the cases of Shah v Ul-Haq (2009) and Widlake v BAA Ltd (2009). [read post]
27 Aug 2019, 2:00 am
The post Flowers v Mississippi: Jury Selection in Death Row Inmate’s Case Was Unconstitutional appeared first on Constitutional Law Reporter. [read post]
6 Aug 2015, 5:09 am
In addition to the key case of Rottmann v Freistaat Bayern [2010] ECR I-1449 numerous other authorities such as Kaur [2001] All ER (EC) 250, McCarthy [2011] All ER (EC) 729 Zambrano [2011] ECR I-1177 and Dereci [2011] ECR I-11315 were analysed and applied to his case. [read post]
23 Nov 2018, 8:09 am
This week, the UK Supreme Court refused permission to appeal in the matter of Secretary of State for Exiting the European Union v Wightman and others. [read post]
9 Jan 2014, 10:17 am
United States, ___ A.3d ___ (2013), a recent case dealing with the required mental state for unlawful entry. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 3:01 am
The United States Supreme Court has decided in favour of AT & T in the much awaited decision of AT & T v Concepcion. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:08 pm
The United States today filed this notice of withdrawal of its previous motion to file under seal in Martin v. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 6:47 am
In June, the Supreme Court granted certiorari in Torres v. [read post]
