Search for: "State v. Stone" Results 1581 - 1600 of 2,193
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2012, 8:38 am by Lara
  While the article states that Stone filed a complaint with the Consumer Protection Division of the Iowa Attorney General’s Office, I imagine Anchor has or will have an even bigger problem with Harley-Davidson, which probably won’t be too pleased to learn of Anchor’s sale of a counterfeit Harley truck. [read post]
19 Mar 2020, 8:34 am by Dan Bressler
” “Once the policies implemented by your company (or client) have been updated to address CCPA requirements, those policies must not be set in stone. [read post]
21 Aug 2006, 5:56 pm
  (For discussions, see this post by Geoffrey Stone of Chicago and this chain of posts by Jonathan Adler at VC.) [read post]
4 Nov 2009, 4:41 am
Ballot measures driven by prejudice are poison; honesty and equality are the essential cure.11/04/09 NY Times:The NY Times reports that supporters of same-sex marriage have already begun to question the "state-by-state strategy" of enacting marriage-equality laws in states that do not have any bans on same-sex marriage:Richard Socarides, who advised President Bill Clinton on gay issues, said such federal litigation [Perry v. [read post]
18 Apr 2008, 5:07 am
" In one of the cases that established the "good faith" exception to the exclusionary rule exercised for 4th Amendment violations (United States v. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 3:17 am
Changus Assistant General Counsel Florida Department of Corrections 2601 Blair StoneRoad ' Tallahassee, FL32399Fax 850-922-4355 RE: STATE OF FLORIDA v. [read post]
21 Mar 2011, 10:07 am by Ashwin Sharma
Customs and Border Protection (CBP) Deputy Commissioner David V. [read post]
27 Dec 2018, 7:27 am by Eric Goldman
Lawyers may not state or imply another lawyer is part of the advertising firm if the statement or implication is untrue. [read post]
20 Feb 2014, 12:00 pm by Jon Robinson
  Instead, the court determined that it must apply the two-prong test announced by the Supreme Court of the United States in Chandris, Inc. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2023, 1:51 am by INFORRM
Australians being sued for defamation may miss out on new defences depending on which state or territory law applies, prompting renewed calls for the federal government to step in to pass national defamation laws. [read post]