Search for: "The State Bar Court of the State Bar of California"
Results 1581 - 1600
of 11,377
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jan 2022, 3:35 am
Both courts relied on a 1997 state Supreme Court decision, Snyder v. [read post]
1 Jan 2022, 12:23 pm
United States 1986); and any garbage they leave by the curb (California v. [read post]
30 Dec 2021, 7:38 am
These rules require 19 years of schooling and bar exam preparation, which is not exactly how things may be done in California. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
But earlier this month, regulatory reform in California suffered a setback when the chairs of two legislative judiciary committees in the state accused the state bar of “divert[ing] its attention from its core mission of protecting the public” by considering proposals to allow nonlawyers to provide limited legal services. [read post]
29 Dec 2021, 9:22 am
But earlier this month, regulatory reform in California suffered a setback when the chairs of two legislative judiciary committees in the state accused the state bar of “divert[ing] its attention from its core mission of protecting the public” by considering proposals to allow nonlawyers to provide limited legal services. [read post]
28 Dec 2021, 9:42 am
As one high-ranking executive of a major D&O insurer stated publicly, allegations of “wrongful acts” by board members of a target entity in such transactions fall within the “breadbasket” of D&O coverage. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 10:04 pm
The Fifth Circuit learned that lesson all-too-well with California v. [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:09 am
The Ethics of Working from Outside Your State: PA Bars Adopt ABA Rule (March 3, 2021). [read post]
27 Dec 2021, 7:09 am
The Ethics of Working from Outside Your State: PA Bars Adopt ABA Rule (March 3, 2021). [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 11:30 pm
SBC-20-O-30803).The California State Bar Court exonerated two Humboldt County attorneys of allegations that they committed ethics violations during their handling of a right to die case that resulted in a $1 million settlement.The court found that the attorneys acted in good faith with the information they had and did not intentionally mislead the court when handling matters related to a Dick Magney's end-of-life care. [read post]
23 Dec 2021, 10:00 am
Since Jack filed its lawsuit in California Federal court, we may get the answer to this question. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 6:24 pm
The debtor then appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. [read post]
21 Dec 2021, 12:32 pm
” (emphases added) In California and the 21 states with an OSHA-approved State Plan, the federal ETS is not automatically effective. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 1:45 pm
A significant reason for the persistent and yawning justice gap is that state supreme courts and state bars have long limited who can provide legal services. [read post]
17 Dec 2021, 7:51 am
California Department of Justice Deputy Attorney General – Indian and Gaming Law. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 8:31 pm
The California Court of Appeal noted that it “must follow the California Supreme Court, unless the United States Supreme Court has decided the same question differently. [read post]
15 Dec 2021, 1:31 pm
The registrant’s attorney had numerous exchanges with the successor licensee’s attorney trying to explain the error of his ways, but the scienter bar is quite high. [read post]
13 Dec 2021, 12:38 pm
Substantial civil litigation experience in the federal court system and experience with the congressional oversight process is desirable. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 9:01 pm
Citing earlier California Supreme Court cases, the court recognized “California’s compelling interest in ensuring full and equal access to medical treatment for all its residents, and that there are no less restrictive means available for the state to achieve that goal. [read post]
12 Dec 2021, 1:09 pm
”[5] The applicant appealed the PTAB’s denial to the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, which is now deciding whether Section 1052(c) is unconstitutional in violation of the First Amendment,[6] as that court and the Supreme Court have already decided with respect to the provisions in the Lanham Act barring registration of scandalous, immoral, or disparaging marks.[7] Unlike the bars on registration at issue in Tam and Brunetti,… [read post]
