Search for: "United States v. Choice" Results 1581 - 1600 of 6,472
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 Jun 2010, 1:22 pm by Richard Renner
In its noblest work, it seeks to make the law of the 50 united states more uniform by “restating” the law in a cogent organized work. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm by NL
Louisa WATTS v the United Kingdom - 53586/09 [2010] ECHR 793 This was the admissibility hearing of a case brought by Yvonne Hossack on the closure of a care home by Wolverhampton BC and transfer of the residents to other care homes. [read post]
7 Jun 2010, 3:49 pm by NL
Louisa WATTS v the United Kingdom - 53586/09 [2010] ECHR 793 This was the admissibility hearing of a case brought by Yvonne Hossack on the closure of a care home by Wolverhampton BC and transfer of the residents to other care homes. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 11:38 am by Kyle Duncan
Hodges, fifteen states submitted an amicus brief cautioning that a decision constitutionalizing the issue of same-sex marriage would repudiate the Court’s own recent decision in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2018, 6:30 am by Beth Graham
  In response, Sunbelt filed an appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit. [read post]
1 Jun 2017, 9:22 am by Dennis Crouch
” And, more to the point, “[a]n authorized sale outside the United States, just as one within the United States, exhausts all rights under the Patent Act. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 2:00 pm by National Indian Law Library
United States (tribal trust funds, mismanagement)Iowa Tribe of Kansas and Nebraska v. [read post]
28 Nov 2017, 4:16 am by SHG
United States, the latest opportunity to revisit the Third-Party Doctrine that served as a facile diversion when created, and has undermined any potential for digital privacy in the future. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 9:25 am by Kenneth Odza
Can the food business in the United States function effectively with individual courts and states determining their own common law (or even statutory) rules for product labeling? [read post]
28 Jan 2020, 1:48 pm
The 227 passengers were of 14 nationalities, including 152 Chinese citizens, 38 Malaysian citizens, and 3 United States citizens. [read post]
19 Jul 2009, 1:49 pm
Plumer), and may also require discussion of its forerunners, especially Swift v. [read post]
27 Jan 2025, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
The proposed Idaho Memorial (which would need to be approved on the floor of both houses of the state legislature before it would take effect) provides in part: We, your Memorialists, the House of Representatives and the Senate of the State of Idaho assembled in the First Regular Session of the Sixty-eighth Idaho Legislature, do hereby respectfully represent that: WHEREAS, the decision by the Supreme Court of the United States in Obergefell v. [read post]