Search for: "United States v. Smith" Results 1581 - 1600 of 4,657
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Dec 2009, 7:16 pm by Donald Thompson
Neither our Court nor the United States Supreme Court has held, and I would not now hold, that a two-way-television encounter is "face to face" in this sense. [read post]
1 Nov 2016, 3:49 am by Edith Roberts
First up is State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:45 pm by Jon L. Gelman
Generally, a party “is ‘[o]ne by or against whom a lawsuit is brought,’ ” United States ex rel. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 3:53 am by Edith Roberts
” At Ikuta Matata, Sean Smith notes that in resolving a case brought by a baker who refused on religious grounds to bake a cake for a same-sex wedding, the United Kingdom Supreme Court last week cited the U.S. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 12:16 pm by Orin Kerr
Officers can search anything on the person incident to arrest — letters, booklets, wallets, crumpled packages, and the like — under United States v. [read post]
10 Feb 2010, 9:23 am by Paul McGreal
Given the diversity of religions in the United States, as well as the pervasiveness of the modern regulatory state, a wide array of state and federal laws arguably burden the free exercise of religion. [read post]
12 Jul 2011, 1:16 pm by Kiera Flynn
EMA, and United States v. [read post]
26 Sep 2021, 8:08 pm by Francis Pileggi
The Delaware Supreme Court has announced a revised standard for an important aspect of corporate litigation: the analysis of pre-suit demand futility for purposes of pursuing a derivative stockholder claim, in United Food and Commercial Workers Union and Participating Food Industry Employers Tri-State Pension Fund. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 10:02 am
This morning’s papers across the United States are covered with paralyzed, former dancer, Stephanie Smith’s battle against food giant, Cargill. [read post]
5 Dec 2007, 7:24 am
In more recent cases, however, it has been suggested that under the United States Supreme Court's decision in Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. [read post]