Search for: "Matter of Arthur" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,971
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Nov 2010, 9:00 am by Richard Renner
After this high level employee at Enron reported improper accounting practices, Enron is not thinking about firing Arthur Andersen, they are considering discharging the whistle blower. [read post]
4 May 2022, 9:01 pm by Neil H. Buchanan
Just as Orwell’s warnings have come to life in many ways, some literal and some not quite, “The Handmaid’s Tale” is a story that communicates warnings about how power can be abused without necessarily being accurate about the specific types of abuses that might be visited on innocent people.The difference between an allegory and my conception of a pre-documentary, then, is essentially a matter of degree. [read post]
19 Jul 2020, 9:18 am by Chris Castle
For reasons that are difficult to fathom, China somehow managed to finagle a pass on SarBox compliance in 2013–ahem–that has been decried far and wide (recently by Arthur Levitt, President Clinton’s SEC chairman). [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 11:22 am by Legal Beagle
An investigation into the circumstances of that error was carried out by Dr Arthur Johnston, Inspector appointed by the Scottish Ministers. [read post]
11 May 2017, 8:18 am by Arthur F. Coon
When all was said and done, it was a case of “same wine, different bottle” for Defendant and Appellant San Mateo Community College District (“District”) after the First District Court of Appeal’s published May 5, 2017 decision, following remand from the California Supreme Court, in Friends of the College of San Mateo Gardens v. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 3:31 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In a decision filed January 29, and belatedly ordered published on February 18, 2015, the Fourth District Court of Appeal rejected numerous CEQA (and other) challenges to the City of San Diego’s regular, after-the-fact coastal and site development permits authorizing already-completed emergency storm drainage repair work as well as site revegetation at a hillside site in La Jolla. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 6:04 pm by Arthur F. Coon
In affirming the trial court’s judgment in full, the Court of Appeal soundly rejected all of RCAs arguments, ruling as follows: As a matter of law, the RFEIR did not lack the “accurate, stable and finite project description” encompassing the “whole of [the] action” that is required by CEQA. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am by Arthur F. Coon
  On appeal, LRC argued:  (1) the RSED’s conclusions that increased groundwater pumping was uncertain or unlikely conflicted with its finding that such pumping could have significant environmental effects; (2) the RSED failed to adequately describe or discuss the issue of potential adoption of the Subterranean Stream Delineations as a mitigation measure; and (3) the RSED’s finding that the Subterranean Stream Delineations were infeasible as a mitigation measure was erroneous as… [read post]
8 Nov 2012, 9:51 am by Arthur F. Coon
City of San Juan Capistrano (2004) 120 Cal.App.4th 961, the Fifth District Court of Appeal held as a matter of law that the City needed to comply with CEQA if it exercised its Elections Code § 9214(a) option of adopting the ordinance without alteration, rather than putting the measure on the ballot.   [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 11:59 am by Arthur F. Coon
  Given trial courts’ typically crowded calendars, and the fact that writ hearings consume more court time and resources than typical law-and-motion matters, the timely filing of a request for hearing is important to the orderly and expeditious prosecution of CEQA actions regardless of the status of record preparation. [read post]
12 Jan 2024, 5:07 am by Beatrice Yahia
Signup to receive the Early Edition in your inbox here. [read post]
22 May 2023, 10:58 am by Arthur F. Coon
While the Court agreed as a general matter that compensatory mitigation—i.e., compensating for an impact by replacing or providing substitute resources or environments (CEQA Guidelines, § 15370(a))—“may not be automatically excluded from consideration” when addressing impacts to historic resources, it held that Appellant had failed to show that such mitigation could, in the case before it, substantially lessen the project’s significant impacts. [read post]
23 Apr 2024, 5:18 am by Beatrice Yahia
According to people familiar with the matter, the United States is drafting sanctions that threaten to cut Chinese banks off from the global financial system, arming Blinken with diplomatic leverage that officials hope will stop Beijing’s commercial support of Russia’s military production. [read post]
23 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Paula Mitchell
  Should the State win, the matter very well could end up before that district court again. [read post]
8 Nov 2021, 9:43 am by Arthur F. Coon
In a partially published opinion filed on November 3, 2021, involving the CEQA review for a bed and breakfast/commercial event project proposed on property within a Yolo County agricultural zone, the Third District Court of Appeal (in a unanimous opinion authored by Justice Robie) reaffirmed the basic CEQA principle that a “full EIR” must be prepared whenever a project may have any significant environmental effect; it thus reversed the trial court’s judgment that had allowed a… [read post]
7 Mar 2023, 2:57 pm by Rob Robinson
“Public companies often have dozens of inactive matters, sitting online with discovery vendors,” she explained. [read post]
11 Oct 2017, 11:39 am by Arthur F. Coon
  On appeal, LRC argued:  (1) the RSED’s conclusions that increased groundwater pumping was uncertain or unlikely conflicted with its finding that such pumping could have significant environmental effects; (2) the RSED failed to adequately describe or discuss the issue of potential adoption of the Subterranean Stream Delineations as a mitigation measure; and (3) the RSED’s finding that the Subterranean Stream Delineations were infeasible as a mitigation measure was erroneous as… [read post]