Search for: "State v. Case"
Results 1601 - 1620
of 176,221
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Dec 2015, 4:33 pm
On 4 December 2015, the Grand Chamber of the European Court of Human Rights (“ECtHR”) handed down judgment in the case of Roman Zakharov v Russia ([2015] ECHR 1065). [read post]
17 Feb 2011, 6:11 am
But in Federal Courts, the right to ask the Judge to reconsider is severely limited: you must show newly discovered evidence or a new court case which makes law on your side. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 11:38 am
On March 1, 2017, the Supreme Court of Ohio will hear oral argument in the case of State of Ohio v. [read post]
8 Dec 2022, 8:56 am
The Supreme Court’s cert grant last June in Moore v. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 6:25 am
Case citation: Rangel v. [read post]
12 Jul 2016, 4:18 pm
On June 13, 2016, the Supreme Court decided United States v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 6:34 am
California Public Employees Retirement System v. [read post]
8 Jul 2011, 2:46 pm
United States on a good-faith exception to exclusion for a change in case law, and Ashcroft v. al-Kidd on qualified immunity from civil suit. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 11:33 am
Google trial in the District of Columbia will go ahead.That case has already impacted the California app store case because of the information the three dozen state AGs obtained through discovery in the D.C. case.Google has moved for summary judgment against the DOJ and the state AGs, who have meanwhile filed their opposition briefs, which are sealed for the time being. [read post]
4 Oct 2022, 8:14 am
Michael Dorf, SCOTUS Animal Welfare Case Could Implicate State Power to Ban Abortion Pills In October, the Supreme Court will hear oral argument in National Pork Producers Council (NPPC) v. [read post]
10 Dec 2010, 2:14 am
R (Tilianu) v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 1397; [2010] WLR (D) 320 ” ‘Employment’ within the meaning of art 7(3)(b) and (c) of Directive 2004/38/EC did not include self-employment, with the result that an EU citizen who was no longer self-employed did not retain the status of worker and had no right to reside. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 3:00 am
Muuse v Secretary of State for the Home Department; [2010] EWCA Civ 453;; [2010] WLR (D) 108 “When considering an award of exemplary damages in respect of the oppressive, arbitrary or unconstitutional conduct of government officials where the conduct complained of was considered by the court to be outrageous, it was not necessary to show further that the outrageous conduct disclosed malice, fraud, insolence, cruelty or the like. [read post]
30 Jul 2008, 9:03 am
Regina( C) v Secretary of State for Justice; [2008] WLR (D) 262 “The introduction of an amendment to the Secure Training Centre Rules to permit physical restraint of young offenders in secure training centres to ensure good order and discipline without prior consultation with the Children's Commissioner was unlawful and engaged art 3 of the European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom. [read post]
2 Jul 2007, 2:37 am
R (RJM) v. [read post]
12 Jun 2007, 2:02 am
Secretary of State for Trade and Industry v. [read post]
3 Dec 2010, 1:58 am
Salazar-Duarte v Government of the United States of America [2010] EWHC 3150 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 313 “For the purposes of s 103(9) of the Extradition Act 2003, the person whose extradition was sought was deemed to be informed of the extradition order against him when the solicitors acting on his behalf received a letter, whether by post, fax or e-mail, which informed him that the order had been made. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 11:07 am
Our co-counsel in the case is Brian J. [read post]
7 Sep 2010, 2:21 am
Regina (Ngouh) v Secretary of State for Home Department [2010] EWHC 2218 (Admin); [2010] WLR (D) 239 “It was important when considering a decision based on para 322(5) of the Immigration Rules, under which indefinite leave to remain should normally be refused where it was undesirable in view of the applicant’s “character, conduct or associations”, to look closely at the context in which that paragraph was being deployed and to see the reasoning that had lead… [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 1:58 am
Deane v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2010] EWCA Civ 699; [2010] WLR (D) 162 “In determining whether a claimant seeking Carer’s Allowance was ‘receiving full-time education’, so as to be excluded, it was erroneous to ask how many hours were actually spent on the activities which were defined within the applicable Regulations. [read post]
24 Jun 2010, 1:51 am
Secretary of State for the Home Department v AP (No 2) [2010] UKSC 26; [2010] WLR (D) 154 ”The public interest in publishing a full report of control order proceedings, identifying the suspected terrorist involved, had to give way to the need to protect the suspected terrorist from the risk of violence in circumstances where he was required to live in a town in which there were considerable community tensions and racist attacks on members of the Muslim community had… [read post]
