Search for: "Turner v. Turner" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,913
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Jun 2017, 9:41 am by Mark Walsh
Next up is Justice Stephen Breyer with a 6-2 opinion in Turner v. [read post]
25 May 2012, 9:00 am by Matthew Parham
 Nobody with any prison administration experience apparently submitted evidence of any such threat.Ordinarily in the prison context, restrictions on First Amendment rights are reviewed under the Turner v. [read post]
23 May 2011, 12:41 pm by mjpetro
Horn, 355 F.3d 707, 725 (3d Cir. 2004) (noting that "where a prosecutor makes his explanation for a strike a matter of record, our review is focused solely upon the reasons given"); Turner v. [read post]
19 Aug 2013, 3:52 pm by Stephen Bilkis
In New York and based on the case of People v Turner, a defendant's right to the effective assistance of counsel is violated when defendant's counsel fails to meet a minimum standard of effectiveness, and defendant suffers prejudice from that failure. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 10:00 am by John Elwood
  Rather, it first appeared in dicta in Wilko v. [read post]
24 Oct 2019, 9:19 am
Revokey McRevokeface for McDonalds McMark Supermac's v McDonald's Cancellation no. 14787C, EUIPO (July 2019) I covered an earlier chapter of this burger battle in Volume V, in which poor evidence led to the loss of a BIG MAC EU trade mark registration. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 12:29 am
  ·         OHIM knows its own competences and powers and that, save for exceptional circumstances, it is not for a national court in a Member State to treat an application before OHIM as abuse of process (Case C-159 Turner v Grovit [2004] ECR I-3565 at para [28])  ·         It was illegitimate for a party resisting an application for a stay under Article 104(1) to argue that procedural… [read post]
10 Apr 2009, 7:42 pm by chucknewton
"Any effort, action, or demand by a creditor to collect a pre-petition debt violates the automatic stay".Regardless of the stay violation, Paul Hill contended that he could not be sanctioned for his action of posting the sign because of his entitlement to exercise his free speech right under the First Amendment to the United States Constitution, citing Turner Advertising Co. v. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
At most, their constitutional claims were subjected to relatively low-level scrutiny under Turner v. [read post]
20 Sep 2011, 6:00 am by admin
  The Supreme Court’s 1987 decision in Turner v. [read post]