Search for: "United States v. Yielding" Results 1601 - 1620 of 1,700
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2024, 12:30 pm by John Ross
First Circuit: Every time default looms, Congress swoops in and saves the United States' credit, just like MacGyver. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 12:49 pm by Kevin LaCroix
According to the solicitor general of the U.S. in Goldman Sachs Group Inc. v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 4:50 am
Federal and state courts have recently issued noteworthy decisions yielding important lessons about directors and officers liability insurance policies. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:13 am by David Navetta
People’s United Bank (“PATCO”) and JM Test Systems, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Feb 2021, 6:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
There has, however, been an insufficient focus on just how many questions remain unresolved, and how this vague language could produce double taxation and would certainly yield substantial confusion. [read post]
19 Apr 2018, 6:04 am by Scott R. Anderson, Molly E. Reynolds
Beginning on Jan. 20, 2022, and every four years thereafter—cleverly scheduled to fall one year after the inauguration day for each new presidential term—the president must provide Congress with a report on the activities that the United States is pursuing under the 2018 AUMF and make a recommendation as to whether Congress should repeal, modify, or leave the 2018 AUMF in place. [read post]
14 Mar 2010, 10:47 pm by admin
– Environmental Protection Agency, Federal Register, March 12, 2010 In accordance with section 113(g) of the Clean Air Act, as amended (‘‘Act’’), 42 U.S.C. 7413(g), notice is hereby given of a proposed settlement agreement and consent decree, to address a lawsuit filed by Wildearth Guardians: Wildearth Guardians v. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 3:54 pm by Jared Beck
And Article V enables the states, by “the Application of the Legislatures of two thirds of the several States,” to require Congress to call a Constitutional Convention. [read post]
17 Nov 2024, 9:01 pm by ngodridge
  The Court held that the CFTC failed to demonstrate irreparable harm to itself or the public, a prerequisite for a stay.[2] The outcome of the appeal on the merits, with significant implications for the availability of election gambling contracts in the United States as well as the scope of the CFTC’s authority more broadly, greenlighted elections betting through the November presidential elections.[3]  This week’s election results have seemingly confirmed… [read post]
3 Dec 2015, 6:00 am by Administrator
Blogging itself has experienced several waves of development, yielding somewhat distinct subgenres within the general blogging umbrella,[35] and legal blogging likewise demonstrates evolution and fragmentation.[36] Despite these variations, legal blogging as essentially a subgenre of public legal writing is a sufficiently distinct category to generate a worthwhile discussion. [read post]
25 Mar 2007, 4:00 pm
Last week she yielded to her funny bone with her post about Pull My Finger ® Fred. [read post]
15 Apr 2022, 4:09 am by Emma Snell
Treasury Department’s anti-money laundering unit ha [read post]
12 Dec 2017, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Co-director of enforcement Stephanie Avakian touted the Cyber Unit’s second ICO enforcement action, stating: “We will continue to scrutinize the ICO market vigilantly for improper offerings that seek to sell securities to the general public without the required registration or exemption. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:50 pm by admin
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:46 pm by smtaber
—EPA News Release, December 21, 2009 A southwest Missouri pet supply dealer has agreed to pay a $56,632 civil penalty to the United States to settle allegations that it violated the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA) by repackaging, relabeling and selling an insecticide meant for use on cattle and hogs as a flea and tick treatment for dogs. [read post]