Search for: "AMENDMENT TO RULES FOR MANAGEMENT OF COURT FUND"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 2,644
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jun 2014, 5:02 am
Supreme Court ruled unanimously that public employees are protected from retaliation when they testify in court about misconduct they observed on the job. [read post]
19 Jun 2014, 8:26 am
Nonetheless, this is the rule. [read post]
15 Jun 2014, 9:01 pm
If the Court rules as it should that corporations do not have a soul, and, therefore, no RFRA (or First Amendment) defense, then the UHP case appears to be an easy win for these employees and the EEOC. [read post]
13 Jun 2014, 7:00 pm
Neither by itself provides an adequate guide or basis for creating a rules-based international order. [read post]
11 Jun 2014, 10:26 am
Plaintiffs alleged that Old Guard used their marks to solicit funds from parents and alumni. [read post]
10 Jun 2014, 6:07 am
(Will rules be easier to parse?) [read post]
5 Jun 2014, 4:12 am
It sounds like a simple rule, but it is complicated. [read post]
4 Jun 2014, 8:17 am
Even though there was no coercion here — the groups were free simply to decline the federal funds — Roberts held that Congress had violated the First Amendment. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 12:39 pm
Indeed, the Supreme Court, in its unanimous ruling in 1966 in Mills v. [read post]
2 Jun 2014, 7:51 am
Instantly, a legion of First Amendment lawyers would offer their services pro bono, only too keen to be the next Floyd Abrams. [read post]
30 May 2014, 4:40 am
The Hollywood Reporter explains that the new motions to dismiss from UMG "stems from a 2010 appellate ruling in F.B.T. [read post]
27 May 2014, 3:04 am
” Courts in New York and elsewhere construe this provision, modeled on § 31 [4] of the 1914 Uniform Partnership Act, as a default rule, that is, subject to override in the partnership agreement. [read post]
21 May 2014, 10:33 am
Related posts: * Twibel Ruling: Tweeting That Someone is “Fucking Crazy” is Not Defamatory * 9th Circuit Issues a Blogger-Friendly First Amendment Opinion–Obsidian Finance v. [read post]
21 May 2014, 6:54 am
Richardson, Seventh Circuit: The Court reversed the denial of habeas relief and remanded for further proceedings because the state court applied a rule of law contrary to controlling precedent of the Supreme Court. [read post]
19 May 2014, 3:09 am
Binn announced a proposed $23 million investment by a private equity firm called Mistral Capital Management (“Mistral”) in exchange for a 42% interest in the business, further stating that the funds would be used to reduce company debt and to finance expansion plans. [read post]
16 May 2014, 5:46 am
The grand jury had been considering whether Harrell should be indicted on allegations he used campaign funds for personal use. [read post]
16 May 2014, 1:05 am
The DC Circuit Court of Appeals rejected an industry challenge to the U.S. [read post]
15 May 2014, 10:00 am
In Windsor, the Supreme Court struck down DOMA’s prohibition of the recognition of same-sex couples as married or spouses as an unconstitutional violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. [read post]
13 May 2014, 8:36 am
Supreme Court Upholds EPA's Cross-State Air Pollution Rule" <> GAO-14-290, Army Corps of Engineers: Actions Needed to Further Improve Management of Hopper Dredging, April 10, 2014 - The U.S. [read post]
12 May 2014, 4:49 pm
In Windsor, the Supreme Court ruled unconstitutional the prohibition enacted by Congress, which prohibited the federal government from recognizing marriages or domestic partnerships between same-sex couples that were valid under state law for purposes of federal tax laws. [read post]
