Search for: "Adams v. Adams" Results 1621 - 1640 of 7,218
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Feb 2011, 3:08 am
Article 78 action held the appropriate vehicle to test a public employer’s administrative determination, or failure to actAdams v The City of New York, 271 AD2d 341Typically, challenges to action or inaction by a governmental agency are brought pursuant to Article 78 of the Civil Practice Law and Rules. [read post]
8 Jul 2009, 12:56 pm
Thank you to all the attendees of our webinar earlier this afteroon on "Ricci v. [read post]
13 Apr 2015, 9:08 pm by Nate Russell
The correct test for demonstrating prima facie discrimination per Moore v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 9:39 am
The Adam Walsh Child Protection and Safety Act (AWA), enacted in 2006, created a new federal crime of "Failure to register. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 5:24 am
Adams, applying the Federal Arbitration Act to employment contracts). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 6:30 am by Adam Thimmesch
By Adam Thimmesch The Supreme Court of South Dakota heard oral arguments in South Dakota v. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm by Andrew Hamm
This morning the Court announced its decision in King v. [read post]
16 Jan 2024, 6:04 am by INFORRM
On 8 January 2024, the High Court of Northern Ireland handed down judgment in the case of Kelly v O’Doherty [2024] NIMaster 1 [pdf]. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 3:28 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Biden v. [read post]
31 Aug 2021, 3:28 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Biden v. [read post]
11 May 2021, 3:04 pm by CAFE
 Tamara Sepper – Executive Producer; Adam Waller – Senior Editorial Producer; Matthew Billy – Audio Producer; Jake Kaplan – Editorial ProducerREFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: U.S. v. [read post]