Search for: "In re E.G."
Results 1621 - 1640
of 13,822
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Mar 2021, 5:37 am
See, e.g., “Cat Appears for Hearing After Zoom-Filter Mishap” (Feb. 9, 2021). [read post]
28 Oct 2021, 2:04 pm
Its use in that instance smacks of trolling - as in, "we like the 2017 tax act for other reasons, but just to blow some smoke in the air we're going to use the only measure we can think of that yields the result we want. [read post]
2 Feb 2021, 3:42 am
Chien, 120 USPQ2d 1710, 1716 (TTAB 2016); In re Eagle Crest Inc., 96 USPQ2d 1227, 1229 (TTAB 2010); In re Volvo Cars of N. [read post]
28 Jan 2022, 4:01 am
February 9, 2022 - 10:30 AM: In re J. [read post]
2 Feb 2018, 3:05 am
" In re Cook Med. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 8:29 pm
First, the notice of a tentative settlement (this post continues below the document): In Re Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation: Stipulation and [Proposed] Order re Deadlines in Consumers' and States' Actions in Light of Tentative Settlement It is not surprising that the class-action lawyers would settle with Google: in the end they just want to get paid. [read post]
9 Oct 2018, 2:49 am
See In re Viterra. [read post]
10 Feb 2023, 5:45 pm
We're happy to take your money pretty much whenever you'd like. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 5:01 pm
See e.g. [read post]
2 Dec 2021, 3:08 am
See, e.g., In re Nieves & Nieves, 113 USPQ2d at 1647-48; In re Cotter & Co., 228 USPQ at 204-05. [read post]
7 Jan 2018, 11:47 am
Goods within such general classes remain in this heading even if they are designed for particular uses (e.g., door handles or hinges for automobiles). [read post]
9 Sep 2017, 11:04 am
See, e.g., J.A. 169YES, In re Best arose:... except for the functionally expressed [limitation at issue],” the PTO can require an applicant “to prove that the subject matter shown to be in the prior art does not possess the characteristic relied on. [read post]
3 Sep 2015, 3:06 pm
“They’re acting like a kangaroo court and we are not going to stand for it. [read post]
6 Jul 2022, 10:36 am
But I'll stipulate they're either (1) Republicans, or (2) Democrats. [read post]
15 Mar 2015, 6:57 pm
E.g., Clymer v. [read post]
22 Feb 2022, 2:33 am
See, e.g., In re Aerospace Optics, 78 USPQ2d at 1864. [read post]
18 Nov 2023, 6:59 am
They're short. [read post]
15 Dec 2016, 11:31 am
IMSI catcher evidence as detected by software (e.g. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 4:36 pm
You're deciding guilt or innocence, and sometimes life or death. [read post]
18 Feb 2007, 7:39 am
Poorer Than You, We're in Debt). [read post]
