Search for: "United States v. Chambers"
Results 1621 - 1640
of 2,368
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Jan 2016, 9:42 am
United States, 529 U.S. 848, 857 (2000) (quoting United States ex rel. [read post]
29 Mar 2021, 4:00 am
See also United Mexican States v. [read post]
14 Jan 2011, 10:07 am
Chamber of Commerce et al. [read post]
6 Jun 2011, 2:15 am
In the case of Barach v University of New South Wales [2011] NSWSC 431 the Supreme Court of New South Wales gave the claimant permission to serve libel proceedings on a defendant in the United States. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 5:22 am
Otherwise, they'd essentially just be leaving some units unguarded, or more likely "guarded" by "building tenders" (inmate enforcers), like back in the bad old days, pre-William Wayne Justice and Ruiz v. [read post]
5 May 2010, 12:21 pm
Perpich united two of the defining commitments in his life: his allegiance to the Constitution and his experience serving the United States during World War II. [read post]
11 Mar 2023, 3:21 am
MexicoPetitioner v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm
Circuit in the case of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:48 pm
Circuit in the case of Coalition for Responsible Regulation v. [read post]
19 May 2015, 9:05 am
Appeals Court Environmental Decisions <> Town of Barnstable v. [read post]
9 Jul 2013, 1:01 am
It is telling that the citations in the footnote to my quoted sentence were to a legal scholar that Justice Thomas also quoted in the same opinion that tends to agree with his view of federal power in Indian affairs, Sai Prakash, and to a Supreme Court opinion that Justice Thomas is rallying against, the lead opinion in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 4:19 pm
United States, Dkt. [read post]
20 Jul 2011, 11:33 am
It was the subject of a recent Supreme Court case, Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
Constitutional Challenge to False Marking Statute Oral arguments in the case of United States, ex rel. [read post]
10 Feb 2009, 8:26 am
Given that Membership of the EU is dependent upon Member States adhering to the Convention, does the UK intend to pull out of Europe or alternatively implement the ECtHR decision in Hirst v UK(No2)? [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
Those three, along with Justices Anthony Kennedy and Neil Gorsuch, joined Thomas’ opinion rejecting the contrary ruling of the United States Court of Appeals for the 9th Circuit. [read post]
9 Jul 2023, 4:35 pm
We had a comment on the Chamber decision in 2021. [read post]
16 Apr 2023, 12:37 am
Claire Poppelwell-Scevak, Strasbourg Observers: ‘Until Social Norms Say I Do’: How the Grand Chamber Taketh and Giveth Away in Fedotova and Others v Russia: on the recent case in which the GC ECtHR held that there is a positive obligation under Article 8 for member states to afford some sort of legal recognition and protection to same-sex couples. [read post]
22 Sep 2021, 9:27 am
” Here, the court’s determination to deny defendant’s request for attorney’s fees was largely based on its assessment of defendant’s credibility at trial regarding the state of her own finances, her failure to fully account for large sums of money that she had received, and her failure to fully account for assets belonging to plaintiff that she purportedly used for his benefit during the period they were separated. [read post]
6 May 2014, 11:50 am
It is an oddly consoling aspect of the United States Supreme Court that we basically get the Justices we deserve. [read post]
