Search for: "United States v. State of Missouri" Results 1621 - 1640 of 1,849
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2018, 11:21 am by John Elwood
United States, 17-8995, involves the truly obscure question of whether a period of supervised release for one offense is tolled during a period of pretrial confinement (that, upon conviction, would be credited to a defendant’s term of imprisonment for another offense). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 9:33 am by Jeffrey Mitchell
Congress has reportedly authorized $550 million in the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) ReConnect funding in 2019 (as compared to $600 million in 2018). [read post]
1 Sep 2012, 3:10 pm by Russell Beck
Nevada: The United States District Court for the District of Nevada held in Switch Communications Group v. [read post]
22 Dec 2023, 1:35 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
First, the court found that the state consumer protection law claims couldn’t cover the US because it wasn’t enough to allege that “substantially similar statutes” exist in all other states is insufficient, and they only cited California and Missouri consumer protection law in the complaint. [read post]
1 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Amy Howe
In a Term in which the Court was not considering the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act, Texas’s redistricting plans, and Arizona’s controversial efforts to regulate immigration, the Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 10:07 am by Dennis Crouch
  The IPR procedure is only being used against the best United States patents. [read post]
20 Jun 2023, 5:55 am by Jennifer Papapanagiotou
§247d), the Secretary, HHS, determined that a public health emergency (PHE) exists for the United States.[4] February 4, 2020 – Secretary, HHS Declared that a Public Health Emergency Exists Under the FD&C Act: Under Section 564(b)(1)(C) of the Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act), the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) determined that there was a public health emergency that had a significant potential to affect national… [read post]
31 May 2024, 7:00 am by Rogier Bartels
Before the military commission set up by the United States for those individuals held in Guantanamo Bay, Mr. [read post]
15 Mar 2021, 9:05 pm by Monte Mills
In 1823, Chief Justice John Marshall concluded in Johnson v. [read post]
23 Mar 2012, 7:31 am by Joshua Matz
” Finally, commentators discussed the Court’s recent pair of plea bargain decisions: Missouri v. [read post]
The United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for example, has focused on ESG by investigating and taking action against companies that tout business practices such as consideration of environmental sustainability, but fail, in practice, to live up to their claims. [read post]
7 Jan 2025, 9:32 am by jonathanturley
That is expected to draw even greater attention with the continued discovery in Missouri v. [read post]