Search for: "Ames v. State" Results 1641 - 1660 of 16,191
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2009, 6:00 am
I'm coming up on a particularly busy period at work and am therefore putting the blog on hiatus once again. [read post]
31 May 2015, 6:50 pm by Carl Neff
In what may have an impact upon the Court’s selection of arbitrators under the Delaware Rapid Arbitration Act, the Court of Chancery considered and denied a motion to disqualify an appraiser in the case of AM General Holdings LLC v. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 5:17 am
In a slight that the list of contributors to the right won't forget, I am kidding of course, Senator, Senate Committee on the Judiciary Ranking Member Arlen Specter sent a written question to Solicitor General nominee Elena Kagan, that began: Last year, in Kennedy v. [read post]
26 Feb 2025, 6:31 am by Ellena Erskine
Following the opinion announcements, the justices will hear oral arguments in Ames v. [read post]
17 May 2006, 11:05 am
I am a little late with this post (seeing my sporadic blogging these weeks you might guess what my time schedule looks like), but I wanted to comment on the 20th ratification of the Protocol on Explosive Remnants of War (Protocol V to the 1980 Convention) of 28 November 2003.With this ratification made on May 12th the protocol, which was concluded by 91 states parties to the Conventional Weapons Convention in 2003, reached its quorum and will enter into force in 6 month… [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 4:59 pm
” Brinker also required its employees to sign a form stating “I am entitled to a 30-minute meal period when I work a shift that is over five hours” and that “If I work over 3.5 hours during my shift, I understand that I am eligible for one [10-]minute rest break for each four hours that I work. [read post]
8 Feb 2025, 8:42 am by Eric Goldman
Reddit * More Evidence that FOSTA Benefited No One * Omegle Denied Section 230 Dismissal–AM v. [read post]
16 Mar 2017, 11:49 am
Finally, I am proud to be a part of this court and a judicial system that is independent and courageous, and that vigorously protects the constitutional rights of all, regardless of the source of any efforts to weaken or diminish them. [read post]