Search for: "Price v. State" Results 1641 - 1660 of 11,975
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
., sued the manufacturer, Artoss GmbH, for breach of contract after it refused to ship new NanoBone products to Plaintiff without advance payment and for raising its prices. [read post]
9 Sep 2022, 8:43 am by Eric Goldman
In support of that conclusion, the court makes this murky statement: “courts in this Circuit have repeatedly held that a plaintiff may state a claim under the Lanham Act where the defendant (1) interfered with the plaintiff’s ability to offer its own commercial services, and/or (2) used the Internet. [read post]
31 May 2011, 9:10 am by Phil
Pentalpha then started selling its fryers to Sunbeam, which resold them in this country under its own trademarks at a price that undercut SEB's. [read post]
9 May 2016, 4:19 am by John Jascob
Finding that the action was filed in a state court of competent jurisdiction and was thus not removable, the court granted the plaintiff's motion to remand (Electrical Workers Local #357 Pension and Health & Welfare Trusts v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm by Jennifer Mersing
  The Second Circuit found this pricing mechanism was different than the Maryland program struck down by the Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
27 Sep 2018, 4:37 pm by Jennifer Mersing
  The Second Circuit found this pricing mechanism was different than the Maryland program struck down by the Supreme Court in Hughes v. [read post]
22 May 2023, 7:46 am by Eric Goldman
Before the state bar could reach that conclusion, they would have to do more work to validate that the 236 entries are indeed misdirected, something this court punted on. [read post]
15 Apr 2019, 11:44 pm
Retromark Volume V: the last six months in trade marks1. [read post]